It is hard to imagine that the forefathers of these people somehow never invented the wheel or multi-story buildings on their own.
NFL players’ dad ignites social media frenzy as racially charged remarks about ‘breeding’ resurface
The dad in question is a Scholar-American with the generic name of John Brown. His sons on the other hand have anything but generic names: Amon-Ra Julian Heru John St. Brown, Equanimeous Tristan Imhotep J. St. Brown and Osiris St. Brown (he probably has a longer full name but I wasn’t interested enough to go looking). Having a boring, bland name daddy John Brown decided to name his sons after two Egyptian gods and the third, Equanimeous, has a name that means possessing stability or an even temperament. Pretty amusing for a 2G but he is the product of a German mudshark mother so…
His three sons are pretty outstanding athletes, all three played college ball and two went on to the NFL. Amon-Ra St. Brown plays for the Lions and is a three time Pro-Bowler and two time All-Pro. Equanimeous is apparently out of the league at this point but did play a few seasons. Osiris played at Stanford but didn’t make the NFL.
So yes, that is an impressive athletic trio of sons. When asked by his son Amon-Ra on his podcast how that happened, John Brown declared it the result of breeding:
“Look at you – good athlete, good athlete,” he said of his sons. “I’m Black, his mom is White. Now, I’ve done stepped on it once, you can’t keep stepping on it because you’re gonna mess it up. You’re going to weaken it. … Can’t keep cutting it.
“You and Brooklyn’s (Amon-Ra’s fiancée) half and half, you have a chance. … You can’t keep cutting it. You got to be careful. You can’t keep cutting it. You got to think about that. You know what I mean? If I’m Black, I got the Black gold running through my veins, I’m excited. I’m just going to find the right person to mate with. If I’m White, I’m saying, ‘Let me get one of these brothers around here,’ if you want to have athletes.
“If you don’t want to have athletes, then just go ahead and spread your seed wherever. … I knew I could cut it once. … I got Black gold in me and mama got that big chin and big toes. I said, ‘Look, ain’t nothing wrong with a big toe’d woman.’ You got to think of this stuff. Some guys don’t think of it ‘til later.”
That is good stuff. The way he talks about “stepping on it” and “cutting it” is the sort of language drug dealers use when they use an adulterant to “cut” pure cocaine or heroine, making it less potent but creating more product to sell. If you “step on it” too much, the drugs won’t have the same effect. Classy way of talking about your children.
This is pretty much the same line of thought that got sports commentator Jimmy “the Greek” Snyder fired back by CBS in 1988.
The black is a better athlete to begin with, because he’s been bred to be that way. Because of his high thighs and big thighs that goes up into his back. And they can jump higher and run faster because of their bigger thighs. And he’s bred to be the better athlete because this goes back all the way to the Civil War, when, during the slave trading, the big, the owner, the slave owner would breed his big black to his big woman so that he could have uh big black kid, see. That’s where it all started!
Oh dear that was terribly racist Jimmy! Um, but is it true? Is it just an amazing coincidence that positions like running back, wide receiver and defensive back are so dominated by blacks that it has become a cliché? For decades the NBA has likewise been dominated by blacks. East Africans have dominated marathons for as long as I can remember while West Africans are great sprinters, East Africans being tall and lanky and West Africans generally being shorter and more powerful. This is one of those weird examples of something everyone knows and no one is supposed to say:
- It is undeniable that blacks seem to be naturally suited to sports that emphasize raw speed and the ability to jump
- It is racist to notice that black are naturally suited to sports that emphasize raw speed and the ability to jump.
Why is this something that many people are absolutely terrified to talk about?
John Brown isn’t totally wrong. Physical traits are hereditable. That applies to things like strength and speed which everyone understands but doesn’t say. When you acknowledge that, you have a problem because there are other traits that are hereditable and the big one, the great taboo, is intelligence.
It isn’t perfect. There are certainly dumb people that have smart kids and smart people that have dumb kids, just as there are people with no athletic talent that have children that are great athletes and great athletes that have children that cannot walk and chew gum at the same time. Generally speaking over a large sample size it holds up.
For example, the 18 year old basketball phenom Cooper Flagg, recently the number one overall pick in the NBA draft. Flagg is 6’ 8” and an amazing athlete. Sure, his parents pushed him to excel in basketball his entire life but it is also true that both of his parents played college basketball.
On the flip side is….me. My parents taught me to read at a very early age so that when I got to kindergarten I was reading at an 8th grade level and skipped class when the other kids were learning their ABCs, instead sitting on the stairs reading the Reader’s Digest. Had my parents emphasized basketball instead of reading….I would still be a great reader who had plenty of time to read sitting on the bench. My dad is a giant of a man standing maybe 5’4” and my mom barely broke 5’. On the other hand, my dad was a physician and my mom was one of the most voracious readers you would ever meet. Absolutely no amount of parental encouragement would have made me a great basketball player. I might have been a bench warmer in high school but college? Not if I spent 8 hours per day from the time I could walk practicing basketball under the tutelage of Bobby Knight.
I wonder if you were to flip the question around to John Brown and ask him about breeding for intelligence instead of athletic ability, would he be OK with the same logic? My wife and I have 8 White children that vary in intelligence from above average to way above average. If I for some reason married a black chick or even a mestizo, would my 8 kids be as intelligent? Almost certainly not but they might have been more athletic.
Heritability is commonly understood in physical traits. Modern agriculture prior to genetic modification was based on this. The best Holstein bulls were used to impregnate cows because the results were predictable. Crops were bred the same way. Champion bloodlines in race horses and show dogs mean enormous breeding fees because winners are much more likely to sire future winners. One of our Amish neighbors had a relatively famous stallion and they made lots of money jerking off their stud and selling his semen.
Intelligence is not a mystical force, it is a physical trait, and however you measure it (typically by IQ) intelligence shows clear heritability. When a black man like John Brown says he specifically chose a spouse because he wanted his children to be great athletes, most people nervously chuckle at how silly he is but John Brown makes them nervous because once you admit physical traits are heritable, it is only a short walk from “can run fast” to “is good at math”.
I would love to put the question to John Brown if he would agree that you can breed for intelligence and that in that case when you mix Whites or Asians with blacks, you dramatically reduce the chances of having exceptionally intelligent off-spring. If he was being honest and didn’t immediately fly into a rage, I think he would have to agree. That is why his comments are “controversial” and why anyone who suggests that intelligence is a heritable trait is immediately ostracized.
Ahh, the “inconvenient facts” that you are forbidden from discussing.
When I was in graduate school I was doing research in OLD like 200+ year old documents in the state archive of a Deep South state. I came across documents about slave “stud farms”. Yes, there were people hunting high and low for the strongest black males and females and would breed them to create “super slaves” who could work all day in the cotton fields and never break a sweat.
I also came across even older documents where slave owners would get “indentured female servants” ie white slaves from Ireland and forcibly breed them with their strong black male slaves to make more intelligent slaves for work not in the fields but around the plantation that required more intelligence.
FYI almost all “blacks” in the US have white blood in them and by DNA tests the white side is almost always Irish. Now some slave owners mated with their female slaves later but I know where that Irish blood truly comes from.
When I told my graduate advisor what I found, he went white as a sheet and told me that that is 100% true but never ever mention it or my career would be ruined.
Dr James Watson the discoverer of DNA discussed this 20 years ago and people howled, screamed and shut him up.
Most people can’t handle and don’t want to accept the truth.
Hahahaha. Hence the term smoked Irish.
Hahahaha. Hence the term smoked Irish.
“that is 100% true but never ever mention it or my career would be ruined”
Very familiar, in a totally different field. A neurologist friend of mine who studies musicians found structural differences in the brain that related to a certain relatively uncommon musical ability, and that this ability was not found equally among races. (Greatest prevalence among East Asians) My friend drafted a preliminary report and excitedly showed it to a senior colleague. The senior guy said, “Oh, that’s well known in our circle, but we don’t talk about it because it’s “racist” and it would destroy the career of the person who was naive enough to try and make it public. Now you’re German. You REALLY don’t want to be the guy talking about actual physical brain differences that lead to superior performance.”
SSDF: same shit, different field.
It’s weird how 100 years ago, pretty much everybody was a eugenicist to some degree, the smart set were very much eugenicists, eugenicism was commonly accepted thought, and then something happened, and now nobody is allowed to be a eugenicist anymore. The conditioning in the opposite direction so severe and so effective that many or even most people do not even allow themselves to think eugenicist thoughts, let alone say eugenicist words. In only 100 years. Less, really. It was 1988 when Jimmy the Greek was cancelled, and I’d say that not even 50 years before that eugenicism was still pretty commonly accepted.
The aftermath of WWII and Nazi ideology is what put the damper on eugenics.
What’s hilarious is that the “elite” are big time eugenicists but it is hidden and not publicly discussed.
I just find it funny that we publicly discuss dna and crossing breeds in plants and animals but NEVER humans.
While they are bringing the dire wolf back it would be waay easier to bring back a neanderthal.
Does anyone think that there isn’t a neanderthal alive today locked up in a lab somewhere ?
My mom subscribed to Reader’s Digest when we were kids and I loved the vocabulary quizzes.
Off topic but this coming weekend in Charlotte there’s the Black Boat Weekend. As Paul Harvey would say “Stand by for News”.
https://www.theblackboatweekend.com
Sky,
.
My life is now complete.
.
‘Stand by for news!”
Sky, Gee, that’s weird. All the boats in the link are white. And all the females look like they have Irish blood. None of them look like they were bred to be athletes.
it’s not ALL athletics though, only some.
i watch a LOT of MMA and MMA basically boils down to wrestling, striking and Brazilian Ju-Jitsu (BJJ). There are some good black wrestlers, there are some good black strikers (there are a LOT of top level black boxers) and almost no top level BJJ guys. In general, if a black guy gets taken down, he’s getting submitted. not always but it’s a fair rule of thumb. Lots of them are very athletic guys, that just happen to get into combat sports (esp in the bigger weight classes, where technique isn’t as important (less competition), but they never really improve. It’s like they like hitting things and working on things they enjoy but never really on the things they aren’t good at or require lots and lots and lots of grinding effort. It’s a bit stereotypical but many of them just brawl. (not all).
And swimming. Blacks and swimming is beyond a meme at this point. Even watching survivor (before it went totally gay) there would be the one black guy on the island and of course he can’t swim despite being a college athlete (so plenty of opportunity). Even the boat videos, the blacks are on the boat but they are deathly afraid of the water.
I LOL at Jimmy the Greek comments back in an earlier segment of the Long March.
I haven’t followed the Negro Felon League since Colon Krapernick and the kneel and bob.
“We will use racial tensions to tear apart the fabric of American society.”
CPUSA 1922
They’re descended from (almost 100%) west/Nigerian Africans, who apparently needed to sprint. I wonder why? Anyway, other groups (east Africans) are better distance runners. But IQ? That’s the same for everyone. /sarc
Or as I put it to someone (who subsequently refused to speak to me for a year — no loss; I won twice), “So your position is that evolution stops at the neck?”
East Africans have a couple of advantages in very long distance events. First, they have relatively smaller feet, and spindly calves (even among negroes in general; they ALL have scrawny calves compared to whites). The minuscule biomechanical advantage of the reduced foot and lower leg weight adds up over 20+ miles in energy savings. Second, growing up poor (walk or run everywhere) at altitude is excellent substrate to becoming a distance runner.
Another thing that almost never gets discussed is that blacks mature much faster than other races. The same is true for more-indio Mestizos too, but it’s not as consistent. Black kids are basically fully physically mature at age 14 or so.
Where you really see this is in intramural college sports. Black kids get a big leg up in the high school system and onward to NCAA. But once white kids catch up, there’s much less difference in athletic ability. It’s even more true with the East Asian kids, who are the latest bloomers of all.
I say intramural sports because I went to a ghetto-ish state college and the intramural teams were usually racially divided. You could see the parity pretty clearly. When the black teams started losing they invariably tried to start a fight.
This encapsulates much:
“Mark LeVine, a history professor at the University of California, Irvine, sums it up most eloquently, “While whiteness and its avatar, ‘Western civilization,’ have for centuries declared themselves to be the epitome of Enlightenment and freedom…”
Where have Blacks ever been successful?
Last week we just had a White sub-Saharan African (Elon Musk) launch a spacecraft while Black sub-Saharan Africans destroyed several cities.
Name a civilization (or even a written language) ever created by Blacks.
Name a single contribution from sub-Saharan Africans to the world.
The simple fact is, everything Blacks have was given to them by Whites.
Blacks are the only race never to have civilized. They were removed from the jungle just 250 years ago.
Blacks can only achieve because they have White admixture or because they reside in White societies. Too few of them are smart enough to even build sufficient infrastructure in Africa to allow the Black intellectual elite to achieve.
Whites are only 10% of the world’s population and the only race in population decline (creating only 7% of the world’s babies), yet are the most industrious and innovative race the world has known. Whites unlocked the secrets of DNA and relativity, launched satellites, created automation, discovered electricity and nuclear energy, invented automobiles, aircraft, submarines, radio, television, computers, medicine, telephones, light bulbs, photography, and countless other technological miracles. Whites were the first to circumnavigate the planet by ship, orbit it by spacecraft, walk on the moon, probe beyond the solar system, climb the highest peaks, reach both poles, exceed the sound barrier, descend to the oceans depths… Blacks cannot even feed themselves.
Whites created every country for Blacks, but now have to provide food, medical, financial, and engineering aid to every one. Blacks cannot survive without White charity.
No pre-contact Black society ever created a written language, or weaved cloth, or forged steel, or invented the wheel, or plow, or devised a calendar, or code of laws, or system of measurement, or math, or built a multi-story structure, or sewer, or drilled a well, or irrigated, or created any agriculture, or built a road, or sea-worthy vessel. They never domesticated animals, or exploited underground natural resources, or produced anything that could be considered a mechanical device.
Blacks were still living in the Stone Age when Whites discovered them just 400 years ago.
Blacks are the oldest race, so they should be the most advanced — but they never advanced at all. Sub-Saharan
Africans never made any contribution to the world. Everything they have was given to them by Whites. Blacks lived alone in Africa, a vast continent with temperate climates and abundant resources for 60,000 years so they cannot blame slavery, racism, colonialism, culture, environment, or anything else for their failures.
Simply, life is an IQ test.”
Also Mark LeVine: “As long as you think you’re white, there’s no hope for you.” That was LeVine concurring with his co-ethnic the execrable Noel Ignatiev who called for the “abolition of whiteness”.
—
Interesting that Wikipedia has no Early Life on LeVine. Hmmm. And the category tags at the bottom of the page are curiously uninformative. But the text of the article reeks of “try hard” and “I used to get stuffed in lockers from K through high school.”
—
LeVine is supposed to sound, I dunno, French? Is he like one of those assholes who insists that his name is pronounced Shah-PIE-ro and not Shah-PEE-ro?
“It’s Fronk-en-steen.” The fact that shitheads like this are faculty in American universities demonstrates why higher education in the country is utterly broken (and enemy controlled).
THX. Did not know this about the character. One would think that he would not dare to venture negative opinions (or thoughts) about the black race given his apparent hate of Whites.
And, deep down, this is not an inconsistency, as there is ample evidence that (((js))) as a group, do not see themselves as White but as a cut above–the “Chosen.”
Oh yeah? Well, what about that guy that did the stuff with the peanut?
(sarcasm, for those of you with little sense of humor)
John Brown can fuck right off, if I want to spend time watching some beast chasing a ball around, I’ll get a dog! I will care a lot more about the dog than about him, his pickanninies or his Bigfoot mudshark wife.
Genetics. Selective slave breeding netted enough athletic blaques to support three major sports! leagues. Whoopee!
And all the men that rank in World’s Strongest Man are Swedish, Scottish, British, Finnish, American or some other (former) bastion of The Ruddy Faced Man.
Shawn’qual Johnson runs fast and gots to get paid. Finn Finngaardsen deadlifts 800 lbs on his rest days and eats six times a day. Ubiqwe Ramalamadingdong runs marathons and no one really knows why. Goldfarb is their agent and he’s the one getting rich. Yawn.
Well, the German race traitor wife is as white as they come. Her sons vary from very African to seeing some Whiteness in them. All of the sons are dating or engaged to…….White women. Imagine that.
Not only did John and Miriam name their children after Egyptian gods, they also added “St.” to their kids’ last names. John said that’s because he wanted his sons to be distinguished. That is the lamest and stupidest statement that I ever read.
Yeah…what HE said….
It’s kind of funny, I have this theory about the reknowned beauty of Scandinavian women. The Vikings raided the coasts and rivers of both Western and Eastern Europe for hundreds of years, and women were a prize catch. They were put to work as thralls in the Jarl’s household, and the prettier ones (and beauty was an original selection feature) were made available to become wives for the Jarl’s loyal followers. Their culture also self selected for martial prowess, so to this day there is an uncommon prevalence of beautiful women and large handsome men.
Blacks in the Americas went through a selection filter of a different kind.
“Whene’er they’d reach a foreign beach they stopped to raid and plunder.
Each Nordic brute got so much loot their longship near went under.
But though they rolled in coins of gold they had one joy forsaken.
For on each raid Thor’s party made, no women could be taken.
Each drab and queen fled from the scene when Viking sails were sighted.
And Thor felt needs for certain deeds that had gone unrequited.”
—from The Thong of Thor, by John Boardman
http://40yearoldfanboy.blogspot.com/2011/04/on-classic-telling-of-classic-joke.html?m=1
The inner-city slum-trash is an evolutionary dead-end.
That group is incapable of providing the most fundamental necessities to survive.
Max,
.
The black in America is the result of selection hundreds of years ago by their black sellers on the west coast of Afrika.
Showing suspiciously Nordic-esque discrimination, their black sellers kept the beautiful and intelligent, offering the ugly idjits to the jew buyers.
.
Bumbling inbred half-wits and utterly incapable of recognizing neither intelligence nor beauty, the jew rented those people by the dozens so Steven Spielberg could make his crowning masterpiece AMISTAD.