
It is hard to imagine that the forefathers of these people somehow never invented the wheel or multi-story buildings on their own.
NFL players’ dad ignites social media frenzy as racially charged remarks about ‘breeding’ resurface
The dad in question is a Scholar-American with the generic name of John Brown. His sons on the other hand have anything but generic names: Amon-Ra Julian Heru John St. Brown, Equanimeous Tristan Imhotep J. St. Brown and Osiris St. Brown (he probably has a longer full name but I wasn’t interested enough to go looking). Having a boring, bland name daddy John Brown decided to name his sons after two Egyptian gods and the third, Equanimeous, has a name that means possessing stability or an even temperament. Pretty amusing for a 2G but he is the product of a German mudshark mother so…
His three sons are pretty outstanding athletes, all three played college ball and two went on to the NFL. Amon-Ra St. Brown plays for the Lions and is a three time Pro-Bowler and two time All-Pro. Equanimeous is apparently out of the league at this point but did play a few seasons. Osiris played at Stanford but didn’t make the NFL.
So yes, that is an impressive athletic trio of sons. When asked by his son Amon-Ra on his podcast how that happened, John Brown declared it the result of breeding:
“Look at you – good athlete, good athlete,” he said of his sons. “I’m Black, his mom is White. Now, I’ve done stepped on it once, you can’t keep stepping on it because you’re gonna mess it up. You’re going to weaken it. … Can’t keep cutting it.
“You and Brooklyn’s (Amon-Ra’s fiancée) half and half, you have a chance. … You can’t keep cutting it. You got to be careful. You can’t keep cutting it. You got to think about that. You know what I mean? If I’m Black, I got the Black gold running through my veins, I’m excited. I’m just going to find the right person to mate with. If I’m White, I’m saying, ‘Let me get one of these brothers around here,’ if you want to have athletes.
“If you don’t want to have athletes, then just go ahead and spread your seed wherever. … I knew I could cut it once. … I got Black gold in me and mama got that big chin and big toes. I said, ‘Look, ain’t nothing wrong with a big toe’d woman.’ You got to think of this stuff. Some guys don’t think of it ‘til later.”
That is good stuff. The way he talks about “stepping on it” and “cutting it” is the sort of language drug dealers use when they use an adulterant to “cut” pure cocaine or heroine, making it less potent but creating more product to sell. If you “step on it” too much, the drugs won’t have the same effect. Classy way of talking about your children.
This is pretty much the same line of thought that got sports commentator Jimmy “the Greek” Snyder fired back by CBS in 1988.
The black is a better athlete to begin with, because he’s been bred to be that way. Because of his high thighs and big thighs that goes up into his back. And they can jump higher and run faster because of their bigger thighs. And he’s bred to be the better athlete because this goes back all the way to the Civil War, when, during the slave trading, the big, the owner, the slave owner would breed his big black to his big woman so that he could have uh big black kid, see. That’s where it all started!
Oh dear that was terribly racist Jimmy! Um, but is it true? Is it just an amazing coincidence that positions like running back, wide receiver and defensive back are so dominated by blacks that it has become a cliché? For decades the NBA has likewise been dominated by blacks. East Africans have dominated marathons for as long as I can remember while West Africans are great sprinters, East Africans being tall and lanky and West Africans generally being shorter and more powerful. This is one of those weird examples of something everyone knows and no one is supposed to say:
- It is undeniable that blacks seem to be naturally suited to sports that emphasize raw speed and the ability to jump
- It is racist to notice that black are naturally suited to sports that emphasize raw speed and the ability to jump.
Why is this something that many people are absolutely terrified to talk about?
John Brown isn’t totally wrong. Physical traits are hereditable. That applies to things like strength and speed which everyone understands but doesn’t say. When you acknowledge that, you have a problem because there are other traits that are hereditable and the big one, the great taboo, is intelligence.
It isn’t perfect. There are certainly dumb people that have smart kids and smart people that have dumb kids, just as there are people with no athletic talent that have children that are great athletes and great athletes that have children that cannot walk and chew gum at the same time. Generally speaking over a large sample size it holds up.
For example, the 18 year old basketball phenom Cooper Flagg, recently the number one overall pick in the NBA draft. Flagg is 6’ 8” and an amazing athlete. Sure, his parents pushed him to excel in basketball his entire life but it is also true that both of his parents played college basketball.
On the flip side is….me. My parents taught me to read at a very early age so that when I got to kindergarten I was reading at an 8th grade level and skipped class when the other kids were learning their ABCs, instead sitting on the stairs reading the Reader’s Digest. Had my parents emphasized basketball instead of reading….I would still be a great reader who had plenty of time to read sitting on the bench. My dad is a giant of a man standing maybe 5’4” and my mom barely broke 5’. On the other hand, my dad was a physician and my mom was one of the most voracious readers you would ever meet. Absolutely no amount of parental encouragement would have made me a great basketball player. I might have been a bench warmer in high school but college? Not if I spent 8 hours per day from the time I could walk practicing basketball under the tutelage of Bobby Knight.
I wonder if you were to flip the question around to John Brown and ask him about breeding for intelligence instead of athletic ability, would he be OK with the same logic? My wife and I have 8 White children that vary in intelligence from above average to way above average. If I for some reason married a black chick or even a mestizo, would my 8 kids be as intelligent? Almost certainly not but they might have been more athletic.
Heritability is commonly understood in physical traits. Modern agriculture prior to genetic modification was based on this. The best Holstein bulls were used to impregnate cows because the results were predictable. Crops were bred the same way. Champion bloodlines in race horses and show dogs mean enormous breeding fees because winners are much more likely to sire future winners. One of our Amish neighbors had a relatively famous stallion and they made lots of money jerking off their stud and selling his semen.
Intelligence is not a mystical force, it is a physical trait, and however you measure it (typically by IQ) intelligence shows clear heritability. When a black man like John Brown says he specifically chose a spouse because he wanted his children to be great athletes, most people nervously chuckle at how silly he is but John Brown makes them nervous because once you admit physical traits are heritable, it is only a short walk from “can run fast” to “is good at math”.
I would love to put the question to John Brown if he would agree that you can breed for intelligence and that in that case when you mix Whites or Asians with blacks, you dramatically reduce the chances of having exceptionally intelligent off-spring. If he was being honest and didn’t immediately fly into a rage, I think he would have to agree. That is why his comments are “controversial” and why anyone who suggests that intelligence is a heritable trait is immediately ostracized.
Ahh, the “inconvenient facts” that you are forbidden from discussing.
When I was in graduate school I was doing research in OLD like 200+ year old documents in the state archive of a Deep South state. I came across documents about slave “stud farms”. Yes, there were people hunting high and low for the strongest black males and females and would breed them to create “super slaves” who could work all day in the cotton fields and never break a sweat.
I also came across even older documents where slave owners would get “indentured female servants” ie white slaves from Ireland and forcibly breed them with their strong black male slaves to make more intelligent slaves for work not in the fields but around the plantation that required more intelligence.
FYI almost all “blacks” in the US have white blood in them and by DNA tests the white side is almost always Irish. Now some slave owners mated with their female slaves later but I know where that Irish blood truly comes from.
When I told my graduate advisor what I found, he went white as a sheet and told me that that is 100% true but never ever mention it or my career would be ruined.
Dr James Watson the discoverer of DNA discussed this 20 years ago and people howled, screamed and shut him up.
Most people can’t handle and don’t want to accept the truth.
It’s weird how 100 years ago, pretty much everybody was a eugenicist to some degree, the smart set were very much eugenicists, eugenicism was commonly accepted thought, and then something happened, and now nobody is allowed to be a eugenicist anymore. The conditioning in the opposite direction so severe and so effective that many or even most people do not even allow themselves to think eugenicist thoughts, let alone say eugenicist words. In only 100 years. Less, really. It was 1988 when Jimmy the Greek was cancelled, and I’d say that not even 50 years before that eugenicism was still pretty commonly accepted.
The aftermath of WWII and Nazi ideology is what put the damper on eugenics.
What’s hilarious is that the “elite” are big time eugenicists but it is hidden and not publicly discussed.
I just find it funny that we publicly discuss dna and crossing breeds in plants and animals but NEVER humans.
While they are bringing the dire wolf back it would be waay easier to bring back a neanderthal.
Does anyone think that there isn’t a neanderthal alive today locked up in a lab somewhere ?
My mom subscribed to Reader’s Digest when we were kids and I loved the vocabulary quizzes.
Off topic but this coming weekend in Charlotte there’s the Black Boat Weekend. As Paul Harvey would say “Stand by for News”.
https://www.theblackboatweekend.com
it’s not ALL athletics though, only some.
i watch a LOT of MMA and MMA basically boils down to wrestling, striking and Brazilian Ju-Jitsu (BJJ). There are some good black wrestlers, there are some good black strikers (there are a LOT of top level black boxers) and almost no top level BJJ guys. In general, if a black guy gets taken down, he’s getting submitted. not always but it’s a fair rule of thumb. Lots of them are very athletic guys, that just happen to get into combat sports (esp in the bigger weight classes, where technique isn’t as important (less competition), but they never really improve. It’s like they like hitting things and working on things they enjoy but never really on the things they aren’t good at or require lots and lots and lots of grinding effort. It’s a bit stereotypical but many of them just brawl. (not all).
And swimming. Blacks and swimming is beyond a meme at this point. Even watching survivor (before it went totally gay) there would be the one black guy on the island and of course he can’t swim despite being a college athlete (so plenty of opportunity). Even the boat videos, the blacks are on the boat but they are deathly afraid of the water.
I LOL at Jimmy the Greek comments back in an earlier segment of the Long March.
I haven’t followed the Negro Felon League since Colon Krapernick and the kneel and bob.
“We will use racial tensions to tear apart the fabric of American society.”
CPUSA 1922