Everyone is writing about this and saying similar stuff. Russell Brand was fine to do all sorts of degenerate things as long as he was a celebrity leftist, once he allegedly converted to Christianity (and I find most celebrity “conversions” highly suspect) and spoke out against Covid restrictions they turned on him. Nancy Muldoon has a good piece on this here:
BRAND NEW WORLD
The hypocrisy on display is blatant. Keith Woods pointed out here that Pakistani men like Sajid Mahmood Khan and Amreaz Asghar who groomed, abused and raped underage White girls got far lighter relative sentences.
In late-1990s Keighley, a Pakistani rape gang groomed, plied with drugs and alcohol, and repeatedly raped two "highly vulnerable" girls aged between 13 and 16, with the victims describing gangs of Pakistani men sometimes queuing up to take turns raping them. One of the rapists, Sajid Mahmood Khan, was sentenced to just 3 years in prison. Another, Amreaz Asghar, received 4 years and 6 months. Mohammed Din received 14 years for 11 separate counts of rape, or 1.25 years per rape. Russell Brand today received 10 years and 6 months prison, with 9 years being for the charge of raping a fan 17 years ago, who travelled to his house for consensual sex, and who later alleged that he had non-consensual anal sex with her during the consensual sex.
— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) November 9, 2026
Others like Matt Van Swol pointed out here that the case against Brand is incredibly old and flimsy…
For those who don’t know the Russell Brand case… Imagine being sentenced to 10.5 YEARS in prison for alleged offenses dating back as far as 22 YEARS AGO, in a case where the police say there was zero CCTV footage, zero forensic evidence, and digital enquiries were limited because SOOOOO much time had passed, and prosecutors themselves acknowledge that the passage of time limited the available evidence, and yet STILL a jury convicts you in a case built primarily on testimony, and then you get to sentencing and the judge acknowledges the work you have done helping people overcome addiction, including paying for their treatment, acknowledges that your children will lose the presence of their father, and also accepts that there is no sound evidential basis to conclude you pose a future risk, and still sentences you to 10.5 YEARS in prison, again following convictions reached without CCTV or forensic evidence, and now you’re left asking how the testimony and supporting material established the disputed acts beyond reasonable doubt despite those gaps, and how the court justified a sentence that will take years out of your children’s childhoods for offenses from nearly two decades earlier, which is roughly where Russell Brand is tonight.
— Matt Van Swol (@mattvanswol) November 9, 2026
Just adding a flavor of Every Single Time to the story…
Russell Brand’s 10 year sentence for having consensual sex with some groupies is a cautionary tale. One that is only now just being grasped by those remnant White males in the midst of their racial extinction. The final insult? Check out the early life bio of the court Judge. https://t.co/y35Atv1i80
— VertigoPolitix (@Vertigo_Politix) November 10, 2026
It is a good reminder that the #MeToo era completely turned due process upside down. As I understand it, and I apologize for the nastiness, the woman he was convicted of “raping” willingly went to him for the purpose of sex, at one point stuck her tongue in his anus and it was only when during the course of various sexcapades that he in turn penetrated her anally that she was “raped”.
This also happened something like 17 years ago.
I can’t say with any certainty what I had for lunch last week and it sounds like the sort of degeneracy that Brand was engaged in was as commonplace for him back then as eating lunch is for you and me. I still have no idea what he did to become famous and don’t care enough to look but the point for the fellas reading this is clear:
Be cautious where you are sticking it
Granted the vast majority of my readers are a) male and b) my age or older. It isn’t as though I have groupies lining up offering weird sex stuff or anything and I wouldn’t be interested at all anyway as I am quite content with my wife of over 30 years. Now that I think about it, I never had groupies as apparently being a racist blogger doesn’t bring in the chicks like whatever Brand did. I doubt many of you are getting those offers either.
Still it bears noting: just because you can doesn’t mean you should. We live in a world where an alleged sexual encounter from decades before can be retconned into “rape” for any reason or no reason at all. It doesn’t matter what actually happened, what matters is what some random chick says happened.
This is also why degeneracy is an important issue in right wing circles even if you aren’t a subscriber to some form of traditional religion. When people ask why I care about sexual degeneracy as I am not a Christian, this is the “why”:
Degenerates are easily compromised.
This is why I am suspicious of online personalities that have sketchy or opaque personal lives, with Nick Fuentes as an obvious example along with the once main villain of the story Richard Spencer. There was that whole Tila Tequila thing back in the heyday of the alt-right that I also am not totally sure of the details about but I am sure was gross. Greg Johnson at Counter-Currents writes some great stuff but he is also a homosexual and therefore not to be completely trusted.
Put another way, these are deeply serious times and degenerates are unserious people.
I would sooner listen to a guy that isn’t as polished in his writing or his videos but has a stable life and employment than some slickly produced guy that can’t/won’t get a steady girlfriend and has never held a real job.
Anyway that is way more than Brand as a person deserves to be talked about but the caution is universal. Those frat boys at Cornell had no idea that some whore taking on all comers would end up biting them in the ass later on. They were drunk, she was giving it out so why not? Now they know the why not.
Gee, why are young men giving up on women entirely?
Can someone please explain to me why our side is quick to throw people under the bus when their views don’t line up with yours but then want to quote The We must hang together or they will hang us when they get into trouble and need our help…Boggles my mind it really does…