Menu Close

More From The Don’t Be Dumb Online Files

Ha, the Feds can’t see me. I post anonymously!

The internet is a place where you can be whoever you want to be. Even a guy in a wheelchair or with asthma can become a barbarian warrior or a cunning wizard and people with severe social anxiety can speak boldly about topics they would never broach in public. Sure it isn’t real but it provides an escape and no one knows who you are. If I have a rough day I will either write to give me something else to think about or play a video game.

The anonymity works in little stuff. Where it doesn’t work? When you are saying things online that draw the attention of the American Stasi.

While we all know it, this is worth remembering. The full apparatus of U.S. “law enforcement”, especially at the Federal level, is not really all that concerned with gangbangers shooting each other by the thousands or illegal aliens flooding our country or deadly fentanyl coming into the country by the bushel. What Federal “law enforcement” is really worried about is “White supremacy” and “hate speech” and will do whatever they can to find and arrest “White supremacist extremists”, even if they have to incite them and entrap them. A couple of recent examples:

New Batch Of Patriot Front Records Reveals More Evidence Of FBI Infiltration

The FBI released a new batch of records on the white nationalist group Patriot Front on Tuesday, revealing that its members have been talking to the feds.

Patriot Front members are placed under arrest in Idaho. / IMAGE: @MrAndyNgo

The 112 pages of FBI records are almost entirely redacted, but the reason for some of the redactions is noteworthy: The FBI cited section B7(d) of the Freedom of Information Act, which is an exemption designed to protect the identities of confidential sources—or, in other words, FBI informants.

Headline USA found at least three records citing B7(d) while skimming through the records.

One of the few unredacted records in the new batch also shows that a Patriot Front member agreed to a voluntary interview with FBI agents.

According to that record, the Patriot Front member told agents that Patriot Front was a group that peacefully demonstrated, encouraged its members to get off drugs, and promoted physical activity. However, several portions of the interview are redacted, including the member’s information about his social media activity. The redactions cited in this portion of the FBI file were those designed to protect privacy.

Tuesday’s FBI document dump is the latest evidence of federal infiltration in the Patriot Front. It follows a New Yorker article from last month, which revealed that the group may have provided information to the FBI about a left-wing Antifa member who infiltrated and doxxed its members.

The exposed Patriot Front members were furious at Vincent [after he doxed the group]. To strike back, they appear to have enlisted an unlikely ally: the F.B.I.,” the New Yorker reported.

Another batch of records released in July showed that the group was infiltrated by at least one undercover informant.

“On February 11, 2019, FBI Charlotte received Confidential Human Source (CHS) reporting from [REDACTED] Division regarding [REDACTED],” the record stated.

Patriot Front is a “real life” action group that puts up posters and hangs banners and is widely derided by people on the right, mostly from people that don’t do anything other than post snarky comments. My opinion? At least they are doing something and try to encourage young White men to get physically fit. I am also sure that their ranks include a number of Federal informants and at least a few actual undercover Federal agents. It is a lot easier for a White guy with a buzzcut that works for the Feds to infiltrate Patriot Front than it is for him to become a full fledged member of the Crips. Second example…

Woman sentenced to 18 years for conspiring to sabotage Baltimore substations, cause blackouts

A Maryland woman was sentenced Wednesday to 18 years in prison and a lifetime of supervised release for allegedly conspiring to sabotage electrical infrastructure in the Baltimore area. 

Sarah Beth Clendaniel, 36, of Catonsville, Maryland, was arrested in February along with Brandon Russell, an alleged neo-Nazi leader from Orlando, Florida. The FBI accused the pair of planning attacks on the power grids serving Baltimore.

“Sarah Beth Clendaniel sought to ‘completely destroy’ the city of Baltimore by targeting five power substations as a means of furthering her violent white supremacist ideology,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement…..

FBI Director Christopher Wray said the sentence should deter others who attempt to carry out attacks on infrastructure.

According to Clendaniel’s plea agreement and other court documents, she and Russell espouse a white supremacist ideology and advocate a concept known as “accelerationism,” which holds that the current system is irreparable and without an apparent political solution. Therefore violent action is necessary to initiate societal and government collapse.

You will note that she was sentenced to 18 years for plotting to do something, while I can find hundreds of examples with absolutely no effort at all of black criminals who have committed dozens of actual felonies, committing real violent crime and not just talking about it, who get minimal sentences of a year or two and are back on the street committing more felonies. As I said, the “law enforcement” community has been given orders to treat “White supremacists” as a far greater threat simply for talking about doing something than the hundreds of thousands of blacks committing actual crimes in real life every single day.

I am careful about what I write online, while I don’t shy away from naming The Name or pointing out and mocking blacks for being criminals, you will note (as will any Federal officers visiting, welcome!) that I am not inciting or encouraging anyone to commit acts of violence. I don’t generally censor comments so I don’t exercise editorial control over what people say but I would still caution everyone who visits and comments to not be dumb.

There are obviously a lot of people that think using a pseudonym to comment online makes them invisible, while not using a VPN so their IP is recorded, and often using their main email address. Signing your comment as “GreyManTacticalOperator69” but then using “BobAndersonTopeka@aol.com” as your email address is not the camouflage you think it is. Many browsers will autofill your information, including your personal email address. I am also sure many webhosting companies would trip over themselves to provide your information to the Feds if you are Fedpoasting.

Please take basic precautions. The best one is to simply not say anything online that could get you in real trouble. Hurfing and blurfing about stuff is fine but just be smart about it. What you might say to your buddy you have known for ten years in his garage over a beer is one thing, what you say online is completely different. I use my real name to post and it is a unique one so I am not hard to track down, I have a large digital footprint going back to the early days of the internet and I have no interest in working for some globohomo corporation where I will be required to grovel at the feet of faggots and blacks. That isn’t true for most of you and that is why I allow you to comment using whatever email address you want, either a completely bogus one or one you used only for naughty speech online. Your comment might end up in moderation but I try to be careful to keep them from ending up in the spam, although it does happen.

I recommend using a VPN for most of you to avoid being doxxed, there are losers out there that have nothing better to do than try to track you down and expose you in real life for being a Thought Criminal. No comments online are worth losing your job over, especially if you have a family to provide for.

The most important thing to remember is that nothing you do online is completely safe and anonymous. Keep that in mind when you post and while you can probably get away with “racist” comments, if you start to say stuff that dances on the border of an incitement to violence, you can get yourself in trouble even with a bogus user name.

Don’t trust completely anyone you only know online. I have people that contact me and I chat with outside of the blog, and I am pretty sure they are legit, but I certainly am not going to text someone about something sketchy. Unless you know someone in real life and have known them long enough to feel comfortable they are who they say they are, assume there is a chance that they are in fact a Fed who would rather “fight crime” by entrapping you into saying stuff they can arrest you for because that is safer than them actually getting off their lazy asses and kicking doors in crack houses.

Have fun, speak freely but just don’t be dumb.

26 Comments

  1. Tree Mike: ef bee eye code name, Foghorn Leghorn

    Fed Poasting is fun and patriotic! Hence my screen name. (HA HA, I used HENCE in a real sentence). I’m also not too worried about 3 am door kickers, because of my platoon of country dogs. Da feds already know everything about me, like I’m a crippled, retarded, broke dick, geezer in the middle of nowhere Tennessee, with no social media following or foot print, except in comments like this. I also know that if you EVER come under their magnifying glass, they can pull up EVERYTHING you’ve EVER done electronically (online, phone, credit cards, med records, fire arm purchases, etc.) for at LEAST 20-25 years.
    Since the Covidioucy, Afgan debacle, stolen 2018, 2020, 2022 elections, I’m pretty sure millions of awakening sheeple, normies, vets and combat vets have swelled the ranks of “The Lists”, so that compared to 2020, I’ve been pushed WAY down in the priority lists. I hope you’re low in the lists. Thanks for your blog, it is much appreciated.

    • ghostsniper

      Your past is completely irrelevant. If they want to nail you they can just fabricate a past for you, and they will win every time.

      Any lawyer worth renting will eagerly jump on a lawsuit against the fed, but, you will need to come up with some seriously long legal tenders right up front for him to take it on. Probably at least $100k.

      So yeah, you can become victimized for any reason or no reason.

      • Arthur Sido

        Plenty of people send in DNA samples to those companies to find their ancestry and I am sure none of those outfits are Fed fronts to collect DNA to later be used against you.

  2. Steve S6

    Re who they prosecute, they are the Sauron Gandalf referred to when he said:

    “There is only one Lord of the Ring, only one who can bend it to his will. And he does not share power.”

    They will always protect their power. Don’t appear to threaten it.

    “FBI Director Christopher Wray said the sentence should deter others who attempt to carry out attacks on infrastructure.” — no, you just taught them to be more careful about it. Though my thought is why bother? Our infrastructure is like the joke about gangrene – doctor: no need to amputate, will fall off on it’s own in a few days.

    Very difficult to hide your identity on-line. Good article summarizing main methods, pros and cons.
    https://irfaanshakeel.medium.com/staying-anonymous-online-vpn-vs-tor-vs-whonix-tails-94bca9b7cc7e
    Best bet is to assume nothing digital is safe. “Meat space baby”, Kojak (probably).

  3. Bobsuruncle

    We have a saying, “If I didnt grow up with you, I dont know you”. I for sure know some of the ones I grew up with and thats why things are small. Still it it good to create a lot of misdirection on the internet, it may frustrate the retards.

  4. Gryphon

    This the inherent problem with the ‘internet’, the Fact that you are USING OTHER PEOPLE’S COMPUTERS. So Absolutely Nothing you do is “Invisible” “Untraceable” or “Secure”. Yes, there are some Encryption Algorithms that are “Effectively Unbreakable” as in they take up far too much Processing Time to ‘crack’ than it is ‘Worth’ to the .gov spooks. BUT the fact you and others are using Encryption in the First Place is just a Red Flag to do Network Analysis of this group. Finding out Who is communicating with Whom is easy, and usually more Important than the contents of the messages.

    And, as this shows, ALL GROUPS larger than 3 Persons are likely Infiltrated, and any really “Large” group like ‘proud boys’ is ALWAYS a fedscum ‘Op’.

  5. Bean Dip Tray

    I don’t fear a J. Edgar Hoover butt plug minions and neither should you.
    Glowie fags are subpar.
    Did you see where a DEI Shaniqua of the DOJ came out said the FIB is about keeping MAGA types in check?
    I’m always happy when an enemy reveals themselves and their plans.
    As for promoting getting violent or agitating, just sit back and relax as this steaming fourth world turd destroys itself with DEI BRA.

  6. saoirse

    When the chosen install their ‘new’ government of political sluts the Merkan gulags will have their grand openings around the cuntry. Thirty-three states (and counting) are proposing or already have legislation to ‘fight anti-semitism’ and ramp-up ‘hate speech’ laws, exclusively aimed at White soopremacists and Natzees. Mearly exercising muh free speech will earn a White person a one-way ticket on a boxcar of their choice. The initial lists are being finalized……. bank on it! Gonna get ugly real fast!!

  7. Anon

    Baltimore was already in ruins since the riots years ago (and was already terrible before then), no?

    I have my suspicions Russell may have been set up as an easy target since he was known and arrested earlier. Just claim that the ‘nazi’ was planning genocide and etc and arrest and lock him up again as an example to Whites, that sort of thing. I haven’t seen any evidence of what they claim, just claims (typical of them. Instead they only release shit like the assassination/ransom note). And with how they love entrapment and similar shit, how are we to know any of what they say or show would be real? They are saying they are hunting down Whites using government agencies (and plenty of NGOs work with them, look at FBI and SPLC for ex.).

    Whatever, either way he’s fucked.

    Don’t be dumb online, but keep in mind that you may be locked away anyways based on their claims you are some sort of extremist, whatever the evidence. Jan 6th and the witch-hunt afterwards should have been an eye opener already. Hell, Ruby Ridge and Waco should have been eye openers.

    Also,
    If trump is made to win, he is just going to be a tiny pressure-release like the last time while accomplishing little to nothing positive and it is looking like he is going to war against Iran since he is going with their claims about Iranian assassins.
    Just what we need, another 4 years wasted while people do nothing and expect trump to fix things.

  8. Troy Messer

    I have some thoughts on fed posting. Apologies for the verbosity.

    If the feds really want your ass, they are gonna get it. VPN’s are not going to help. The feds are more than willing to plant evidence on your computer. I have no doubt that this site has a pasty ass faggot monitor from one of the 3 letter agencies that checks in occasionally to see what is going on. And that anyone who has ever posted has had some kind of analysis done. Much of this work is probably done using AI programmed to bring cases exhibiting certain aspects to attention of case officers.

    But the feds have finite resources. There are probably a number of factors that determine whether they will visit you. Regarding “fed posting” it blows me away that no one on our side has done a legal analysis to determine the boundries of fed posting. When I was a prosecutor in Arizona, a long time ago, there was a crime called Threatening and Intimidating. One of the elements of the crime was that you had to have a present ability to carry out the threat. A wheelchair bound paraplegic in Bisbee, Arizona that threatens to walk over to a victim’s Kingman, Arizona adress (the other side of the state) and kick is ass would not pass the threshold because said paraplegic isn’t walking anywhere.

    Of course the federal definitions of like crimes are probably broader, but they still have elements. These elements are what a prosecutor would have to prove to get a conviction. My guess, is that there is a difference between threatening a broad class, i.e. niggers, versus the POTUS. Any threat of POTUS is going to put you at the head of the line of who the feds are gonna pay attention to. Some dumbass in Idaho threatened Trump. Idaho is a long way from Florida but the feds still took it very seriously. I would think the more specific you are, say a particular congressman or federal judge, the more likely you are gonna get attention. So, the more specific the threat “I’m gonna take my flame thrower” and the more specific the target, and “I am going to [redacted] that federal [readacted] with my .50”, the more likely you are to get into trouble.

    By the way, legally speaking, conspiracies are very easy concepts. The elements are 1) agreement between two or more people , 2) to commit a crime, and 3) and act in futherence. So 2 dudes in a bar, said “He lets go rob a bank.” And dude # 2 says, “Ok, let me go get my car.” He leaves to get his car: boom, a conspiracy. So when you see the news talking about conspiracies, they are mostly full of shit.

    I think the person at most risk here is Arthur. Because they could say he is enabling any threats. Plus, I’m betting, he has the most to lose. I am a broke dick loser hermit. Sure they could put me away, but, I would take it to trial. Which would cost them a lot of finite resources and time for little gain. So, I would encourage him to nuke any comments that he thinks crosses the line, including mine. I won’t be offended. I think Arthur has an idea what I think of niggers, wops, chinks, spics, kikes, etc.

    I think another issue is what state you are in. The redder the state, the less likely the feds are going to prosecute. The feds are unlikely to prosecute a Bonner County, Idaho resident for dissing niggers. The trial would probably be in Boise and Boise is full of faggots, but considering the feds did not nail Randy Weaver to the wall in his trial, the feds probafly doubt their chances.

    Another issue is that I think the feds have a lot on their plate. There are probably some genuine groups whereby there is a lot of chatter between participants that really want things like revolution of pouring some [readacted] on a federal [redacted] and [redacted] him/her/it on [redacted]. They will likely only prosecute easy, open and shut cases.

    So do watch what you say. If things are gonna get spicy soon, the best thing you can do is keep your head low and make a list. Surely there are some people in your AO that deserve some kinetic justice.

  9. Bean Dip Tray

    Remember the poor vintage Legacy American in Utah KIA by glowgirl phags?
    He could barely make it around the block on his own power but said mean things about Joe Joe Brandon online.
    And now Joe Joe got kicked under the bus by his own comrades as that’s how a subhuman commie RAT POS will do ya.
    I’m having fun agitating the New Jack CPUSA (D) lifetime dependent voters with Pat McGroin and other taunts.
    No one wants to play when you are willing to leave the boat and go all the way like Benjamin Willard with Tigerstripe.

  10. Gryphon

    Troy is correct in pointing out the problem, that the fedscum has, in effect, far more resources to “Make a List and Check it Twice” than to deliver presents. No matter how much Computer Time and ‘Data analysis’ is done to ‘Rank the Threats’, there still aren’t enough Door-Kickers to shoot every Dog owned by ‘fedposters’. While to some extent, “Everyone is on a List”, exactly who gets Targeted really comes down to an almost Random process of selection, based, IMO, on the current ‘Visibility’ of the given individual.

    “Obvious” Threats towards a specific bureaucrat are, of course, given much more attention, because first, the bureaucracy MUST Protect its own minions, otherwise it would fall apart. Second, these cases are easy to Prosecute due to “Evidence”. After that, there’s only deciding “Can we ‘make an example of this Badthinker, without ‘Triggering’ a Rebellion.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *