On the headstone of the grave of Western civilization, should anyone remain to carve it, the epitaph must include the ratification of the 19th Amendment.
When I say stuff like that in normiecon circles, it elicits uncomfortable chuckles as most normiecon men are terrified of pointing out the obvious, whether you are talking about gender or race. I am not a “woman hater” and I think the MGTOW movement is a super gay psyop. Women are critical to our movement and the gulf that has been created between White men and women is one of the most insidious and effective tools employed by Them. That does not mean that they are interchangeable with men nor that they are suited to every task men are suited to, with the converse being obviously true. When it comes to things like public leadership, political theory and making often unpalatable decisions, men have always been more suited to the task.
The best male leaders are strong, confident and decisive men who have a supportive and strong woman at their side. I suspect most of the great men throughout history quietly relied on the counsel and encouragement of their women and that especially includes men like generals and Presidents. I am sure most sensible people understand how that works, with men and women working in tandem and complementing each other.
In the traditional Western wedding ceremony, the bride’s father walks her down the aisle and at the front symbolically “gives her” to her soon to be new husband. It symbolizes a transfer of responsibility. When my late father-in-law passed his daughter to me he said to me “take care of her”, a charge I took and still take very seriously despite my failings. Just as it is not good for man to be alone, women need a guiding male hand. Just as young men are headstrong and prone to impulsiveness and reckless behavior that is tempered by having a wife and children to provide for, young women are driven by their emotions and feelings even when those emotions and feelings don’t serve their best interest.
In light of all that, I was directed to a post by Adam Piggott titled Women in Pants. He was responding to a post titled Wokey Women written by some Aussie chick under the pseudonym Cassie of Sydney. As Adam states, the post from “Cassie” details her lunch with a bunch of young, “professional” women who parroted all the usual talking points you would expect from young, woke, indoctrinated women. All well and good until you get to the end of her essay when she writes this:
I’ll end with some optimism, there are glimpses of hope, but they are not found in these woke educated women from Australia’s affluent suburbs, they are found in women such as my manicurist from Vietnam or my beautician, who is a Hazari from Afghanistan. They are women from the western suburbs of Sydney, women that a Liberal Party with any smarts should be courting.
In the meantime, folks, start preparing yourself for a woke world filled with wokey women. Warning, it’s scary, very scary.
In Australia apparently the “Liberal Party” is considered “center-right” and sounds a lot like the establishment GOP, and that already tells you how far gone Australia really is. Here is my comment on her post, I am a little surprised to see that she allowed it through moderation:
This is what passes for “the right” and “conservatism” in 2022, cheering the replacement of your own people with immigrants from Vietnam and Afghanistan and thinking that will preserve your culture. There is an enormous difference between enjoying the economic benefits of a society built by others and wishing to preserve the culture and heritage that made those economic benefits possible.
We see the same thing in the United States. Lots of people arrive here, plug into the economic system we created, make a nice living and never once seem to consider the exclusive role of the European settlers who built this country in making that system work. Once the whole thing collapses, and soon, they will move on to greener pastures without a thought for what they left behind.
Your post epitomizes the “conservative”/libertarian obsession with the “magic dirt theory”, the idea that you can plug any people into a system and get the same results regardless of race or ethnicity. It isn’t true, it never has been true but that doesn’t stop all too many alleged conservatives from trying it over and over again.
That is gentler than what I would like to have written.
Cassie seems like a decent enough girl but in dire need of male guidance to explain why you don’t own the libs by replacing your own people with women from Vietnam and Afghanistan. But this next twat?
Allow me to introduce to you one Kaytlin Reedy-Rogier and warn you about her picture that follows.
There is an old saying about putting lipstick on a pig, but the critical thing to remember is that no matter how much lipstick you slap on it, it remains a pig. Ms. Reedy-Rogier deleted her Linkedin account as I imagine she was getting some less than kind comments but her profile page at the St Louis Integrated Health Network is up and already archived. According to her profile she has a Master’s in Social Work and also a….
…particular expertise in Diversity and Inclusion facilitation as well as HIV/AIDS
What is her particular expertise in HIV/AIDS, preventing the spread by causing men to become flaccid? She also works with a couple of top notch outfits…
Kaytlin…..is active in the community through work with NCCJSTL and the Anti-Defamation League, facilitating dialogue in the community around issues of difference.
The ADL? Well of course. The NCCJSTL is “The National Conference for Community and Justice of Metropolitan St. Louis”, an outfit that sounds like a giant slush fund for various professional race hustlers. Anyway, having established her rock solid credentials for any number of positions in the food service industry, let’s look at the reason she has shown up in the news recently. Keep in mind her profile above declares she is a champ at “facilitating dialogue in the community around issues of difference”. In case you missed it, “facilitating dialogue” is code for “shut the fuck up and listen meekly while I insult you”.
A lecturer for Washington University in St. Louis’ medical school was caught on camera warning students that if they try to debate her on critical race theory and “systemic oppression,” she “will shut that s— down real fast.”
“I have a really hard time being neutral around issues of systemic oppression,” Kaytlin Reedy-Rogier told a class of medical students this past semester in a video exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital. “So oftentimes you will know how I feel. This does not mean that I am opposed to hearing other perspectives. I would like to be very clear about that: I am always willing to engage in dialogue with folks that may disagree with me. Always.”
“And I will not think less of you, nor will I try to fight you or debate you. And in fact, if you try to fight me or debate me, I will shut that s— down real fast,” Reedy-Rogier, who holds a master’s in social work, added.
This is part of the “diversity and bias” training required at Washington University’s medical school that is supposed to be training the next generation of physicians. Just to be clear, she is not opposed to hearing other perspectives and engaging in dialogue but if you try to actually do any of those things, she will shut that shit down real fast. I assume she isn’t intelligent enough to see the contradiction in that statement.
According to this harridan, medicine has a “huge” problem with racism and bias, despite any evidence to prove this (see my review of Stanley Goldfarb’s book on this topic). She also has declared race to be a “social construct”, no doubt leaning on her several years of training in medicine obtained while studying for her MSW. That will come as news to people who have sickle-cell anemia or Tay–Sachs disease.
There is no reason anyone should be taking a woman like Kaytlin Reedy-Rogier seriously but she is being paid by Washington University to indoctrinate medical school students on the dangers of White supremacy, while conveniently ignoring that virtually all of the actual medical training those students receive in medical school and all of the medicine they will one day practice is the result of what she and her fellow woke harpies would consider “White supremacy”.
White women are of course not as violent as Basketball-Americans or the descendants of the Aztecs and Incas, nor are they are devious as Them, but there are an awful lot of them and many are in positions well beyond what they are capable of and those women are causing incredible damage, mostly to the next generation of White women. Many a White Boomer female is sliding into old age alone, facing living out the remainder of their days with only boxed wine, pets and battery operated substitutes to keep them company. Their lives have been frittered away thanks to a lack of male guidance but they have done incalculable damage to succeeding generations of White women who are following their path into loneliness, heartbreak and resentment.
Most women, in the deepest recesses of their core, would gladly trade career, “education” and even the right to vote in return for a stable home life raising children. As with so many things that have been stolen from them by the same people that claim to be champions for women, apparently a category that now includes men wearing panties and lipstick, few women even understand what they have lost. In granting women the right to vote, we also created a system where the interests of men and the interests of women are now seen as not only distinct but inherently in direct conflict with one another. Instead of asking “what is best for families”, we now are told to ask “what is best for women”.
Of course there isn’t any sort of appetite to repeal the 19th Amendment. Even the men most likely to be called “misogynists” in evangelical circles are mainly terrified of upsetting women. Believe me, try bringing up topics like male headship, female submission and women covering their heads in most evangelical churches and you will be eviscerated. Still, it remains one of those things to keep in mind if we get the chance to rebuild.
“What is her particular expertise in HIV/AIDS, preventing the spread by causing men to become flaccid?”
Best line of the week for me. LOL
As a woman and a frequent reader, I must agree 100%. I am an Ultra MAGA and nothing pisses me off more then listening to the liberals women I work with bitch about women in the workforce and lower wages. I point out that every lead, supervisor, manager, chief and director in our office is female. But now that we have transgendered men/woman they won’t have to worry about competing for jobs from men anymore. I also remind them almost daily that we are not a democracy we are a constitutional republic.
Keep on keeping on Arthur.
PS daughter in law is also Ultra MAGA and is home schooling and raising two polite, Christian conservative kids.
Liberal females have no problem at all accepting the idea that men and women are wired to think differently when it is presented to them through such vehicles as the book “Women Are From Venus, Men Are From Mars”. Not only do they accept it, they take it as a gospel truth. If you suggest to them that as a group, they are much too inclined to side with emotion instead of reason to be entrusted with the political affairs of free men, well the reaction you would get would leave you with a good impression of why the Puritans burned witches.
There was a nice essay in a certain underground newsletter a few decades ago that touched on these very points. It quoted another political periodical from the late 19th Century that I recall went as follows: ” The ability and willingness to be governed by reason and the law alone appears to be characteristically male. If power were put into the hands of women, liberty of opinion, and with it free government, would fall.”
My book review of “women are from venus, men are from mars” —
Women are a certain way because reasons. Men are a different way because reasons. This causes conflict. Men must change to suit women in order to resolve conflict. Wash, rinse, repeat.
My wife and I hit a bad spell and she insisted I read that damned book. As far as I can remember, there was only one example where women were supposed to change or back down – and that was to allow a man to have a man-cave. Ever since that book I’ve absolutely hated the concept of man-cave. I paid for the entire house, dammit. It’s all my cave.
Anyway, bit of rant. Back to topic.
Say ‘happy wife happy life’ and nobody bats an eye. Say ‘happy husband happy life’ and listen to em REEEEE
Married women with children tend to vote fairly conservative. Yes you can find many who don’t just as you can find many white soy males who vote D. No fault divorce and subsequent eschewing of marriage altogether by more recent generations I think have probably done more damage than the 19th has.
But we are moving into completely uncharted territory. Never has any society anywhere dealt with large scale political participation by millions of old, never married or divorced cat ladies. It is entirely unknown what this will reap. Not to mention millions of young single ones who have little or no interest in marriage. We are already there on the latter, and rapidly increasing in the former.
In my perfect world I would make a lot of changes to voting, but in this world, the main change I would make that might have some glimmer of hope is age requirements. The constitution states the president must be at least 35. Nobody ever argues with that. Seems like we’ve got pretty good agreement on it. Shouldn’t anyone voting for president then also be at least 35? Makes sense doesn’t it?
But in the society we do have, pretty much all you can do is enjoy the show
The proper Criteria for Voting in a Republic (not a ‘democracy’) is for Men over the age of 20, who are either Landowners or have served at least 2 Years in the Military. Those are the two most important ways to be a ‘Stakeholder’ in the Republic. And no, Immigrants don’t qualify.
I sometimes joke that giving the women the right to vote was the beginning of the end, people laugh, and the discussion moves on. But honestly, I do believe that. There’s no putting the genie back in the bottle now, but damn it all we actually had a great country for a while.
See Ann Barnhardt on the subject
Incredible woman
Arthur, agree with every word. But your characterization of women overall is still too charitable. Although there are always exceptions (and of course, I’d argue I’m one of them), women are generally addicted to attention, aim to please popular opinion, follow the herd, and value feelings uber alles. Emotionally incontinent airheads. Control freaks who insist their husbands account for every moment of their time, or self-proclaimed ‘free spirits’ without discipline or backbone. Cliquish and generally manipulative or passive-aggressive rather than straightforward.
All that being said, I have had a number of close female friends, the best of whom I’d trust to have my back in any situation. But women who never marry remain essentially broken, and end up feeding herds of stray cats or taking up discivilizational social causes due to their warped ‘caring’ instincts.
I’ve heard it said that all childless women are crazy and I’ve never been able to refute it
Nowadays they are encouraged to be crazy
Culture and chemistry are a big factor. I married into a family of Idahoans. The women cook, clean, and take care of their men; who are more than motivated to take care of them. My mother-in-law, with a houseful of young kids, faced down a stalker(she was a looker in her day) and shot him with a single-shot .410. My wife, before I met her, confronted a bunch of Vato Locos trying to break into her car when she lived in Riverside CA. She had a Marlin mdl 60 22 but put them to flight. There are still plenty of good, focused, intelligent mothers and wives in the Red State areas who are standing side-by-side with their menfolk speaking out against the corrupt, syphilitic-thinking culture that characterizes Amerika. And, they are Black, Asian, Latina, and Native American. I have seen and met them.
The looney-tunes “wimmen” we see today have no clue. They stand out in public and disgrace themselves with their tattoos, nudity, and pro-infanticide rants. When Europa goes full Muzzie and their beta male cucks are running for their lives, the Sharia police will have a field day. I suspect it will be very entertaining. Bleib ubrig.
Dweezil the weasel: How to utterly miss the point. Did you perhaps read our host’s very polite and moderately-worded rebuttal to the Australian woman who spouted the same inanity as you? Let’s do a quick compare and contrast.
Your ‘color’ and ‘culture’ blind assertion: “There are still plenty of good, focused, intelligent mothers and wives . . . And they are black, Asian, Latina, and Native American. I have seen and met them.”
Versus Arthur Sido’s first and main point:
“This is what passes for “the right” and “conservatism” in 2022, cheering the replacement of your own people with immigrants from Vietnam and Afghanistan and thinking that will preserve your culture. There is an enormous difference between enjoying the economic benefits of a society built by others and wishing to preserve the culture and heritage that made those economic benefits possible.
We see the same thing in the United States. Lots of people arrive here, plug into the economic system we created, make a nice living and never once seem to consider the exclusive role of the European settlers who built this country in making that system work. Once the whole thing collapses, and soon, they will move on to greener pastures without a thought for what they left behind.
Your post epitomizes the “conservative”/libertarian obsession with the “magic dirt theory”, the idea that you can plug any people into a system and get the same results regardless of race or ethnicity. It isn’t true, it never has been true but that doesn’t stop all too many alleged conservatives from trying it over and over again.”
Splendid rebuttal 3G4ME!
The ancient Greeks considered women to have stopped maturing, emotionally, somewhere between child and adult. Although I’ve known any number of rational, resourceful, competent and capable women, there is always a streak of volatile emotionalism just below the surface. And I think that the more rational, resourceful, competent and capable women would quite agree.
I’d prefer that we all celebrate and accept the rather obvious differences between the sexes, starting with the physical. When there is a 6′ 4″ 240 pound George Floyd crack addict running amok, does anyone really expect a short, stout affirmative action hire who gets spun around when firing her service revolver at the range to be effective in subduing such a person? For that matter, I would not feel at all comfortable leaving a child in the care of a gruff, burly ex-lineman at the daycare center. Perhaps we can stop pretending that men and women are interchangeable in all areas of human endeavor. They are not.
Feminists, both male and female, got us into this mess, pushing well beyond mere ‘fairness’ and into unearned entitlement. It will be non-feminist women who ultimately pull us back from the cliff, if it happens at all. Rescinding the vote for anyone over the minimum age is simply never going to happen. But women (and blacks) were able to vote for generations before the current madness and rot truly set in. I would never dream of denying my wife and other female relations the right to vote. But neither would I expect them to know how to teach their sons to be men.
Well said. Amen.
Hate to say it, but I agree with everything you said.
Great article!! The age old question: What do women want? Apparently not Western Civilasation.
Many of these ‘women’ want what they think they want until they get it. Then they hate it, and despise the givers.
Smartest thing I ever did (mind you, not a long list…) was to court carefully, and politely, and in the old-fashioned way, the best example of top-shelf mid-20th-century slim brunette I met 39 years ago. We’ve just had our 38th wedding anniversary. And – she still fits back in her wedding dress* (after the 3 children we have raised). *Yeah, I’m showing off 🙂
Pingback:Bullshit “Jobs”: Another Result Of Feminism – Dissident Thoughts