If you look up shameless grifters, the first entry should be Dennis Prager. The same would be true for controlled opposition. Prager makes a living doing hokey little videos for normiecons about “conservatism”. For Prager, “conservatism” is mostly synonymous with “what is good for Jews”. The guy has never had a real job doing anything productive as far as I can tell and while he talks the talk about moral values, he has been married three times. And there was the incident where Prager U’s official Twitter account congratulated Dave Rubin and his “husband” for purchasing some babies (see: American “Conservatism” Summarized In A Single Screenshot). He allegedly was in “therapy” for a year after his first divorce, making me suspect that Dennis might be doing a little swinging both ways. With “conservatives” like Dennis Prager, who needs liberals? Prager is a pressure valve “conservative”, toeing the line that has been drawn for him and giving Boomer normiecons a place to vent their spleen at them damn lib’rals while never, ever straying beyond the limits set by those same lib’rals.
So just recently, Dennis Prager went to the internet to declare the latest Unpardonable Sin…
It is a central tenet of moral theology that there are gradations of sin. To argue that God views stealing a towel from a hotel and raping a child as moral equivalents renders God a moral fool. And doing that to God is a sin. If we mortals perceive the universe of difference between such actions, it goes without question that God does, too. The idea that we have greater moral clarity than God is logically and theologically untenable.
In the pantheon of evils, among the worst is Holocaust denial.
We are going to need some additional stone tablets at this rate.
Prager is doing the bidding of his handlers here, targeting new Public Enemy Number 1.5, barely closeted catamite Nick Fuentes. As the “White” sidekick of Kanye West and one of the latest faces of “antisemitism”, Fuentes is the piñata for Them to whack in public to scare off normiecons and serve as a warning to any that might get out of line. Fuentes is mentioned twice by Prager:
There may not be a more documented single event in history than the Holocaust.
Yet, some people, including an American named Nick Fuentes, aggressively deny the Holocaust, asserting that a few hundred thousand Jews, not millions, were killed….That man is one of millions of reasons Fuentes — and those who ally themselves with him — will go to hell. If there is a just God.
Prager’s audience will of course eagerly lap this up, even though I assume the vast majority of them are some flavor of conservative Christians (that already ignore Prager’s multiple divorces and remarriages). I wonder how many of them will consider this: while the New Testament makes no mention of “Holocaust Denial”, it certainly does address the fate of unbelievers including Jews who reject Jesus. Spoiler alert, I hope Dennis saves a nice seat in hell for Fuentes.
Imagine the hubris of declaring that the existence of God rests on whether or not that God will consign Nick Fuentes to hell, not for being a homosexual but for “denying” the Holocaust. I put the scare quotes around denying because you don’t need to deny the Holocaust, but simply to question the narrative or to suggest that there might be some embellishments around the official numbers and stories is the same as claiming that no Jews died in camps at all.
That is what pisses me off. As a very amateur historian I enjoy learning about the past and especially to examine more controversial topics. When someone tells me that a topic is off-limits for discussion and examination, it makes me assume that there is something we aren’t being told. That is sloppy reasoning but it is an unfortunate reaction to a lifetime of discovering that what we know to be true very often isn’t.
His latest screed simply reinforces for me that Dennis Prager isn’t someone to be taken seriously as a thinker and in fact ought to only be taken seriously for being a controlled gatekeeper, working to prevent normiecons from asking inconvenient questions. Like most of the grifters of Conservative Inc. he is someone you should mock and belittle at every turn.