I don't normally do this but this post is covering some vulgar topics so if you are easily offended, and this stuff should offend you, don't read on. Maybe don't share this with your grandma. I'll put in a jump so you can scroll right past if you choose and I wouldn't blame you. It is also a pretty long post, you have been warned.
This is one of those topics that we shouldn't even have to think about but it is 2022 so I guess it needs to be said. What better time to talk about it than during "Pride Month" where corporate America affirms that something revolting and shameful is in fact something to take pride in, especially if it helps to sell more products.
One of the historical barriers to the mainstreaming of faggotry in general is that it is simply revolting. Male on male sexual behavior is disgusting. This article pretty much sums it up.
In heterosexual men, pictures of rotting flesh, maggots and spoiled food induce the same physiological stress response as pictures of two men kissing each other. That is the surprising finding that was recently published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Psychology & Sexuality.
I find it even more revolting. I don't blame a maggot for being gross, their appearance is in their nature, nor do I blame food for rotting. A dude kissing another dude? That is a willful act of violence upon the senses and it is foul to the core. Dudes don't mind watching a couple of chicks go at it but do you know any women who are turned on by a dude sodomizing another dude? If you do know any women turned on by that, you need to find a better class of chicks to hang around.
Back in 1996-1997 or thereabouts my boss was a gay guy. Really nice fellow although he clearly had daddy issues. He often overshared with me about his lifestyle including telling me about his annual visit to a proctologist to make sure nothing was damaged in his poop chute. I was around 25 at the time and he was in his early 30s, about six years older than me. When I was in my 30s I didn't need to go see a proctologist every year or at all, because I didn't have anything shoved in my ass.
That was then, now we have Twitter posts about a special diet for dudes who take it in the ass so they don't shit on the bed or something.
That is a papaya maybe, dressed up like Rob Halford from Judas Priest? I didn't know, and sure as shit didn't want to know, that some fags are called "tops" and some fags are called "bottoms". I'll let you figure out the references. Regardless the video talks about the importance of a proper diet to keep your rectum clear for "a good time" developed by Dr. Evan Goldstein. Yes. Goldstein. Go figure. "Dr." Goldstein is an osteopath, not an actual MD medical doctor and his practice focuses on the really important stuff like this:
I did warn you at the beginning of the post.
I think I have made my point. Faggotry is disgusting.
Even men who aren't actually homosexual but are effeminate in appearance and behavior are gross, even more so than women who are "tomboys". Soft, weak men are revolting. Boys who act like sissies were once told to man up and quit acting like a girl. There is nothing wrong with acting like a girl, provided you are a girl. Boys with feminine mannerisms though? That is simply wrong. There was no greater insult between young men than calling another man a faggot. The mere suggestion that you would have sex with another dude was so revolting as to induce rage.
This was a big problem. The act of sodomy is inherently unnatural and disgusting.
You might wonder what the point of this post is, I think we all get that two dudes having anal sex is about the most revolting thing anyone could imagine but who cares? I'm getting to that, stay with me.
Allow me to draw a line between sodomy and Marxism.
When a people have a strong, functioning family system they are reliant on each other. This reliance on each other undermines their reliance on the central authority of the state. Therefore destroying the family has always been one of the central tenets of Marxism, spoken of at some length in The Communist Manifesto.
For Marxism to be accepted, any barriers to Marxism must be removed. Private property, the family, individuality, religion. The issue? People didn't want to get rid of those things. They liked them. Marx infamously called religion the opiate of the masses but the masses like their religion. They like the feeling of purpose it gives them, far more than the purpose they feel working for the state just so they can stand in breadlines until they die. People like having a family, and to the horror of ugly women everywhere women like having a husband and having kids, raising them and caring for the home.
This is still their mission, as Exhibit A I present this article in The Nation magazine from 2019: Want to Dismantle Capitalism? Abolish the Family
You rightly assumed that the subject of the piece, a so-called "Feminist theorist" named Sophie Lewis, would be a homely bitch no one would want to marry or even have drunk casual sex with. Amusingly she was interviewed by the aptly named Rosemarie Ho, who manages to master the resting bitch face.
Ho? Imma gonna say "no".
How then do they eliminate these barriers to the acceptance of Marxism?
You know most of them. Feminism quickly gave up pretending to be about "equal rights" for women and morphed into man-hating far-left lesbianism. As the late, mostly great Rush Limbaugh used to say:
Downstream from the 19th Amendment granting women the "right" to vote in 1920, we got stuff like widespread contraception that separated sex and child-bearing, no-fault/easy divorces to provide an escape hatch from marriage, abortion on demand becoming another "right", latchkey children coming home to an empty house after school and an increasing percentage of babies being raised by strangers so mom could go fulfill the feminist dream of pushing papers in a cubicle. It only took about 40 years from the ratification of the 19th Amendment to the start of the "sexual revolution" that spelled the beginning of the end for marriage in America.
Elsewhere we saw the Long March through the institutions that started in the entertainment industry and the schooling-industrial complex but now has achieved near total victory by infiltration of two major holdouts, the military and the Christian church.
A problem remained. For all of their efforts to the contrary, men still wanted to have sex with women and women still wanted to have sex with men, and all too often they did and fell in love and got married and had kids (the order varied quite a bit). That means families, messy though they might be, and family is bad for Bolshevism.
The solution? Provide an alternate outlet for sexual behavior.
We saw this decades ago in media attempts to normalize homosexual behavior. It started off with adding harmless and often humorous gay characters into TV shows and movies. They were funny and nice so of course all homosexuals are funny and nice. You didn't see men in bondage gear grinding on each other as you see in "pride" parades today.
To me this culminated in 1999 with the deeply degenerate, Oscar aware winning film "American Beauty". The film is set in suburbia and is heavy handed with the stereotypes and tropes of the "horror" of suburban life, especially the character of Lester Burnham played by deviant Kevin Spacey, a man in a loveless marriage who quits his job, works in a fast food joint and lusts after his teenaged daughter's best friend. The whole film is about as subtle as a steamroller. Suburban mom who is cold and bitchy? Check. Suburban dad who just wants to smoke pot and bang the teenaged friend of his daughter? Check. The next door neighbor who is a White guy, an abusive father and husband, a colonel in the Marines and of course is secretly a NAZI (because all suburban White guys are)? Checkity check check.
In stark contrast to the dysfunctional families that dominate the movie, we have a nice, normal couple. That couple? Jim and Jim.
One Jim is a tax attorney and the other Jim is an anesthesiologist. They are well dressed, friendly, great neighbors. Get it? The gay guys are the only normal people in the suburb. I made that comment to my sister who lives near D.C. once and she got defensive and flustered, claiming it wasn't true but then again the writer and co-producer of American Beauty kinda comes right out and says it:
Get it? GET IT?! THE GAYS ARE THE ONLY NORMAL AND HAPPY ONES!
Add in Queer Eye For The Straight Guy where fags "fix" normal guys who don't dress like fairies, and you see the pattern. The same thing went on shortly thereafter with trannies with shows like Ru Paul and others attempting to make transvestites seems like fun and harmless people instead of the deeply disturbed mental cases they actually are.
They still have a problem. Dudes having sex with other dudes is disgusting.
This brings me back to my original point.
As a teen in the 1980s, you could say there was some sex going on. Like lots of it. It was the era of raunchy films like National Lampoon's Animal House, Porkys, Fast Times At Ridgemont High and Private School that were centered around characters that were supposed to be in their teens. Films featuring actual teens in nude scenes were pretty common back in the 1970s and early 80s. A significant segment of my high school was sexually active and those that weren't having sex were talking about it or trying to be sexually active. Something we weren't doing or even talking about? Anal sex. I recall exactly one conversation about it with a couple of girls I was friends with and it was just bizarre. Why would you want to have anal sex with a chick who has a perfectly good vagina?
When I started college in the fall of 1990, I was at THE Ohio State University. Take a bunch of 18 year old kids, throw them into dorms with boys and girls in adjoining rooms being supervised by 19 or 20 year old students, add in alcohol being sold and served to just about anyone? You have a recipe for lots of sex. I know of at least one girl who got pregnant fairly quickly in the school term and lots of people were having sex, although it was mostly boyfriend-girlfriend stuff as the "hook-up culture" hadn't kicked in yet. My then girlfriend moved down to Columbus with me and got an apartment very close to my dorm and we were engaged by the end of my first semester, married shortly thereafter and with two children when I graduated. Again, lots and lots of sex in the early 1990s but no one I knew of was having anal sex or even talking about it.
Somewhere along the line this changed.
Admittedly my young adult years were very different from most people my age. Perhaps the most popular show when I got out of school was Friends but it never appealed to me. The main characters were about our age, a couple of years older than me, and I could never figure out why they didn't stop whining and get married. They weren't funny, they were immature and insufferable. So I was out of the loop on the casual sex scene when I was in my 20s.
Anyway, for some reason heterosexual couples started having anal sex. I still don't know why you would want to but apparently a lot of dudes prefer it to normal intercourse, while I assume that most girls really don't like it but just go along with it because their boyfriend/husband/random dude she hooks up with wanted to. Something changed.
What seems to have changed is that the porn industry began to push anal sex and normalize it.
I've never been much of a porn guy, I don't find horribly staged sex scenes between a woman with enormous fake tits having sex with a pizza delivery guy all that titillating. Lots of guys really like porn to the point of being unhealthy. As a kid, many older men in our lives had a subscription to Playboy and had copies laying around, much to our delight. Today you can see anything you want, on demand, for free and what men are looking at is getting more extreme. A still shot photo of a naked woman is too tame for most guys, they want women doing stuff that is grotesque and often degrading. Anecdotally it seems that anal sex porn is incredibly popular online.
I don't think this is a coincidence.
The people who run the porn industry are degenerates, which should go without saying. A pretty high percentage of them are The Usual Suspects. I'll go on a limb and say virtually all of them are on the far-left politically. Whether they know it or not, I suspect that they were "encouraged" to push anal sex in their products.
Why you might ask?
To dampen the revolting nature of male homosexual sodomy.
This might seem a little Alex Jones, tinfoil hat-ish but it has been a working theory of mine for a while. I am sure that is not all there is to it, I still think that young men are resentful toward young women (not completely without cause) and the idea of degrading and even hurting them sexually is very appealing to some of them. Not to mention that as pornography becomes so ubiquitous it often sees men become addicted to it and like all addicts many have to keep ramping up the shock value to get the same response, like a drug addict taking more and stronger drugs to get the same high. Still I maintain that the movement to normalize sodomy has an ulterior motive of reducing the revulsion factor of male homosexual activity, making faggotry less revolting and making homosexuality seem like a reasonable alternative to heterosexuality. I would say it has largely been successful.
Again apologies for such a disgusting topic but I think it is important to keep connecting the dots and realizing why seemingly disparate movements like "gay rights" and "climate change" always seem to be interconnected: they are all tactics in the larger movement to usher in a neo-Bolshevik revolution, called "The Great Reset" in contemporary language, but with the same goal: placing all of humanity under the control of a small cabal of people who will rule the world.