Monday, August 31, 2020

The Danger Of Delusion

There have been crazy people for as long as there have been people. It is part of life. Insane asylums are full of people who think they are Jesus or Napoleon. Prisons are full of people who hacked their mom apart with a hatchet. Deluded and deranged people are dangerous but normally their delusions are localized and can be contained by the mechanism of society designed to protect these people from themselves and to protect normal people from them.

What happens when a delusion spreads across millions of people? Now we are dealing with a serious and existential danger. When millions of people start to act as if the real world is fake and their delusions are real, it can be lethal.

A delusion impacting millions of people is widespread in America. It has existed on the fringes for decades but over the last few years it is spreading rapidly and in 2020 is raging out of control. This fever dream is that black people in America are under constant threat of violence from White people and the police. People who should know better repeat this lie, people like LeBron James who claimed in the wake of the Ahmaud Arbery shooting....


Black people are "literally hunted". LeBron knows this isn't true. As I mentioned in my post earleir this month Once Every Minute....

Keep in mind that LeBron James bought a $23 million mansion in Brentwood, a Los Angeles neighborhood that is 84% White, 6.5% Asian and only 1.2% black. It seems that if White people are hunting down black people EVERYDAY/EVERYTIME blacks go outside, black people with the means to live anywhere would want to live where there aren't many White people. Anyway.

LeBron could buy a whole city block in Detroit, the blackest city in America, and build a grand palace for $23,000,000. Instead he lives in a mostly White exclusive suburb. The cognitive dissonance required to claim on the one hand that White folk are "hunting" black folk and on the other hand choose to live in a lily White neighborhood must be driving him insane. What is worse is that I think he really believes this is true in spite of all of the evidence around him and in spite of 35 years of experience with the difference between living in a White neighborhood versus living in a black neighborhood.

Why does he believe this?

LeBron believes he is "literally hunted" because he has endured a lifetime of being told this. In school, in the black community, in the entertainment world. It is all he has heard and voices speaking the contrary are silenced and censored, considered traitors and Uncle Tom's.

It isn't true but in 2020 what is true is only determined by how you feel. If you feel that you are hunted by White people, then that is your reality. Pointing out statistics that show that blacks aren't really more likely per capita to be shot by cops and that blacks who are shot by cops are, in all but a few cases, shot while in the commission of crime and usually while armed and dangerous, falls on deaf ears. Believe me, I know firsthand. People swear that isn't true and when you show them that, for example, blacks commit around 75% of all mass shootings their programming kicks in and they short-circuit. The response is usually rage.

It isn't just black people, many and perhaps most younger White people think that what LeBron said is true. Their response when confronted by facts and reason is blind rage that always teeters on the razor edge of violence. Many have limited experience outside of the White neighborhoods, in homes and schools chosen by their White parents to limit their exposure to the real world. What they know of black people is mostly driven by the media and "education" system and that message is simple: White people are violent and dangerous, the cause of all that is wrong in the world but black people are helpless victims who cannot stand on their own.

It is madness and it is not true but in their twisted minds it is true because that is how they feel. More and more that madness is taking form in actual violence. The examples are many but here are a few.

Man stabs AutoZone employee 7 times, tells police he "felt the need to find a white male to kill"

The black man in question, one Jayvon Hatchett, 19 years of age, apparently chose a White guy at random to attack. What drove him to do this? The story tells us:

"Jayvon Hatchett stabbed an AutoZone employee seven times after watching Facebook videos of police shootings," local news reported on Facebook, citing Columbus Police Sgt. R.S. Mills' court testimony. "Hatchett smiles telling Detective he chose white man at random and stabbed him in the neck. Victim's critical and traumatized by attack according to court testimony."

This White man might die. He was just doing his job when he was attacked and statistically speaking he has probably never done anything bad to any black person in his life. His "crimes" are the result of a fantasy but that fantasy might lead to his death. While it is a lot easier to find endless video clips of blacks attacking White people, we are told that judging all black by those videos are racist. But the rare cases of blacks being killed by cops means that "All Cops Are Bastards" and leads to people saying this sort of stuff:



"I love being black. I love black people. I know some of you may not want to say that … You tell us how to behave when you have taken our lives. The black man is worth something. His life is worth something. I have to say god damn it – if you kill one of us, it’s time for us to kill one of yours. I know everybody don’t want to hear that. But damn why are we the ones who have to keep burying ours and got to keep clean for you to see us as being human? We ain't never did nothing to nobody."

We ain't never did nothing to nobody. Setting aside the double negatives, is that true? This was a march for Jacob Blake and he most certainly did something to somebody, at least according to his alleged victim who claims that Blake sexually assaulted her and wasn't supposed to be around the place where he was shot. Police reports indicate that he attacked officers, shook off being tasered twice and was retrieving a knife from the car when the officer shot him. Based on those events, this speaker seems to be making the case for killing cops even though Jacob Blake isn't dead.

While blacks are mostly in danger of violence from other blacks and at the same time Whites are in far more danger from blacks than the reverse, the popular narrative is of innocent black victims of racist violent crime. Those statistics are readily available to anyone who asks but even showing the evidence is a waste of time. The delusion is too strong and people are getting hurt because of it.

Popular culture plays an outsized role in spreading this delusion. A wildly popular (we are told) new show titled "Lovecraft Country" is set in the 1950s and while the works of H.P. Lovecraft were populated by more traditional monsters, most notably Cthulhu, the new show has a different monster: White people. From the IMDB page for the show:

Lovecraft Country follows Atticus Freeman as he joins up with his friend Letitia and his Uncle George to embark on a road trip across 1950s Jim Crow America in search of his missing father. This begins a struggle to survive and overcome both the racist terrors of white America and the terrifying monsters that could be ripped from a Lovecraft paperback.

While the show is set in the 50s, many people assume things are the same today and White people are apparently portrayed collectively as monsters. In a review at Counter-Currents, Alex Graham writes:

The dominant theme of Lovecraft Country is the association between white people and all that is sinister and dark. Scenes involving white people are accompanied by ominous music and distorted sound effects. In case it wasn’t clear enough, a white man even transmogrifies into a monster at the end of the episode.

Subtle but effective. Popular culture is full of depictions of black people being victimized by White people.

Is it any wonder that so many black people hate Whites and that likewise so many Whites hate their own people? If a fraction of what is said about White people in the popular culture was accurate, I might have a different viewpoint regarding my people. But is isn't true. Delusions are not true but that doesn't make them less powerful.

A crazy person is a danger to those around him.

A group of crazy people can be dangerous to larger numbers of people.

Millions of crazy people? That is the sort of danger that can cause even the greatest of civilizations to collapse. We are not quite to the "Caligula making his horse a Roman consul" level of crazy yet, but we are getting pretty close.

What happens when a delusion becomes the law of the land? That is something I will explore in my next post.

Sunday, August 30, 2020

A Mass Shooting Blast From The Past!

Way back in January, when we weren't terrified of a Chinese bioweapon and you could buy 9mm ammo for a reasonable price, there was a mass shooting in Kansas City at a club called the 9ine Ultra Lounge during an AFC championship game (we had sports back then too): Mass Shooting Alert! AFC Championship Edition

The shooter was black, the people shot were black and there were 17 of them, two fatally shot including the original shooter. In other words, a pretty typical mass shooting.

Well our friends at the 9ine Ultra Lounge are back to their shenanigans.

Four people shot Sunday at KC nightclub where mass shooting occurred in January

There was also a drive-by shortly before the mass shooting in January. You can rely on the media to find the upside in this shooting:

The shooting Sunday was the first reported at the nightclub since the January mass shooting.

The club was closed after the shooting until March and then coronavirus hit but it is still newsworthy that is has been over seven months since the last shooting at the 9ine Ultra Lounge.

Congrats!


Pat Buchanan Understood How To Respond To Riots

From his 1992 Republican National Convention "Culture War" speech...




I understand what Trump might be thinking. Letting the riots run loose in these cities makes Democrats look weak and honestly it is probably helping his campaign. It might be the one thing that rescues his campaign but it is still cowardly. They are going to claim he is a fascist and authoritarian anyway, might as well give them some real authoritarianism.

In May, Ryan Girdusky reported that the Trump strategy was not to interfere because it might hurt "minority outreach".


I hope that is not the case. People are dying, businesses are being ruined. If it is all just a political calculation? That would be disgusting.

Commies understand force. Notice that the riots in Kenosha evaporated as soon as two of them were shot?

You don't negotiate with commies.

Flashpoint

A very safe prediction I have been making since at least last year is that we would see political violence leading up to the 2020 election and that it would result is someone getting killed. With over two months until the election, it is already happening and the frequency seems to be accelerating.

People have been getting injured and killed all year from Leftist violence. It is important to note that you can't distinguish between antifa/bLM and more mainstream Democrats. The Dems might not be out breaking windows but they have been running rhetorical interference for antifa and bLM through the year. People who are reluctantly supporting Biden because Orange Man Bad are finding any and all excuses for the violence.

The violence is pervasive and has been since the lead up to the 2016 election. After the last week, things are at the breaking point.

With the shooting of three commies, two fatally, by Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha after they attacked and chased Kyle, things got warmer. Last night they got pretty hot.

Breaking: Victim of Deadly Portland Shooting Wore Patriot Prayer Hat and Shirt, Blue Lives Matter Patch: Reports

The man was apparently a Trump supporter, pro-police, etc. and was executed in the street. A man can be heard in the videos saying that they had a "Trumper here" and seconds later shots rang out. Other videos show antifa celebrating a man being executed in Portland. As usual Andy Ngo is on the job:



Unlike Kyle, this guy wasn't shot while chasing down and attacking anyone. He was just shot in the street because of his visible support for the police and Trump. It was a politically motivated assassination. You can be sure that the odds of someone returning the favor are pretty high (please note I am not calling for retaliation just making an observation).

With two months to go, things are already out of control. Most people on what passes for the "right" in America are decent people who have families to care for, so we aren't going to start randomly shooting people on the Left. But keep pushing and there won't be much incentive to hold back. If I can't go anywhere I want in America and express my political viewpoints without the threat of being shot by communists, that changes things pretty drastically for me. How are we "The United States" when there are more and more places where wearing the "wrong" hat or t-shirt can lead to potential political violence?

Stay away from crowds, stay out of the cities, pay attention to your surroundings, be prepared to do what might need to be done.

Thursday, August 27, 2020

The Fuse Is Lit

Kenosha, Wisconsin.

A typical midwestern city that most people never even think about. This week the once sleepy little town exploded with "protests", what normal people call rioting. The trigger was the shooting of a violent black criminal who had just tangled with cops and was apparently going for a knife in his car. That isn't the narrative we got initially and it isn't the narrative pushed by the media. At first we only saw a brief clip, filmed from the far side of the car, conveniently missing the black man, Jacob Blake, fighting with the cops. All we saw was him walking around the car, ignoring repeated shouts to stop from cops with guns drawn. We didn't see the fighting with the cops or the attempt to taser him into submission. I am cautiously hopeful that the DA won't do the usual cowardly act of charging the cop with murder just to try to appease the crowd.

Of course, as with any time a black man dies, riots ensued. It doesn't even matter the reason. A black man shot himself in Minneapolis and the rumor mill said the cops shot him, so of course they rioted again. I guess it is the cops fault this guy shot himself.


Stealing crap for justice! They has the insurance so it is OK!

Then a young White kid, only 17 years old, ended up in Kenosha to try to help business owners defend their property. He was attacked, chased down a street, hit with a skateboard and one adult man was threatening him with a gun. He defended himself and two commies are dead and one had a huge hole blown out of his arm.

The cops arrested him the next day.

This had all the signs of being another James Fields incident but regular conservatives started to pay attention. Suddenly attorney Lin Wood (the attorney for the Covington Catholic kids lawsuit) announced he would represent the accused 17 year old, Kyle Rittenhouse, pro bono. A legal fund is being set up. We will hopefully get a decent legal precedent that says if you attack an armed man with intent to harm and he shoots you, tough shit.

What is different is that this kid looks like any White kid that age in America. He isn't a "domestic terrorist", compare his photo to the photos of black thugs shooting other blacks every day in America.


Meanwhile here are some younger photos of the black man shot in Kenosha, Jacob Blake:


The media and Democrats like Ayanna Pressley and Ilhan Omar would have you believe the top photo is of a dangerous terrorist and the bottom photos are of a wonderful guy.

We know the difference. We know that our sons might soon face the choice of cowering before the mob or the prospect of being locked in prison for defending themselves. A choice many of us might be making soon. The Zman summed it up well today:

This is what makes Kenosha a pivot point in the ruling class revolt. This kid is not a scary monster who can be anathematized by the system. Even vulgarians like David Frum think he looks innocent. Note that Frum is okay giving weapons to these kids when they are killing Muslims on behalf of Israel, but otherwise he never wants to see white people holding firearms. For the typical white person, if he had a son, he would look like Kyle Rittenhouse.

Ultimately, that is now the significance of the Kenosha riots. White people are faced with the reality of their sons being sent to prison for the crime of being white. They face having their businesses destroyed because non-whites are ungrateful. They are being harassed at restaurants and in their home by mobs sponsored by the ruling class who have embraced anti-whiteness as a revolutionary cause. It’s no longer an abstract political argument. It’s daily reality.

That is the world we are in. We don't like it. It doesn't matter. We didn't ask for this, we just wanted to be left alone. They wouldn't. It isn't fair and it isn't just. Crying won't change it.

Our politics must be based in the world as it is, not as we wish it were. That world is one that is increasingly aligned against us. If we wish to see it changed, we will have to make that happen.

Whatever the cost.

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Race Hustling In Religious Robes

Leftist "pastor" Eric Mason, who over the years has become quite well off by selling books to White Christians, is now demanding "free" college for blacks as "reparations". For 200 years no less.

Philadelphia Pastor ("Dr.") Eric Mason calls for 200 years of free college for black Americans as reparations for slavery

"HBCUs [Historically Black Colleges and Universities] funded for the next 200 years. Next 200 years. And right after that? You ain't get this, did you? Descendants of slaves not paying for college for 200 years," he said. "Nobody. And canceling every black person's student loan debt. And repaying blacks who paid for student loans."

"You ain't get this, did you?" I am somewhat familiar with Eric's work and he didn't talk like a ghetto-dweller back in the day, using atrocious grammar to sound more "real". Now that he is in an "urban" setting he has adopted an urban lingo, like Hillary Clinton at a black church. According to Eric's website, this is apparently "love language"

To be recognized and trusted in neighborhoods like North Philadelphia, we needed to speak the love language of the community effectively.

I guess "love language" is code for "demanding gibs from White Christians to tickle the ears of his congregation".

Michael Corleone has the appropriate response to shake-down artists demanding money.



I might add a more colorful addendum: Eric, go fuck yourself.

What kind of "minister" promotes racial division and demands that people who never owned slaves pay "reparations" to people who never were slaves? What kind of "Christ-centered" ministry that is supposed to be "reaching souls for Jesus" demands that 2/3 of the population of the nation he lives in be forced to pay for something they didn't do?

Religious talk aside, what kind of a man endlessly whines about how unfair life is and insists on taking from the fruit of the labor of others? No kind of man at all. That is how children think.

Eric has degrees from Dallas Theological Seminary and Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary but talks like he has an 8th grade inner-city education while he appeals to the worst aspects of human emotion: greed, envy, covetousness and hatred.

If Eric cared about his fellow blacks, he would concentrate on the rampant criminality and the skyrocketing murders in Philadelphia. Instead he appeals to the basest emotions of his congregations.

Some minister of Christ.

Monday, August 24, 2020

Are We There Yet?

Almost.

There was another "unarmed black man shot by White cop" incident, this time in Kenosha, Wisconsin. The predictable riots followed.

These really are very rare but the media blows every incident up, while at the same time the media mostly ignores the endless processing of black-on-White violence. There is a reason that any racially charged incident, even something as dumb as a black kid forced to cut his dreadlocks off at some school 1000 miles away, still shows up on my local news feed.

It looked to me at first glance like this was a bad shoot but then again, as is always the case, we only had a small segment of the video to go off of. From what we can see, the black man, Jacob Blake, was being detained and then walked away from the officers. You can see them, with guns drawn, following him and ordering him to stop over and over. He ignored them. They followed him all around the car, shouting for him to stop. He ignores them. He grabs the car door handle and a cop tries to pull him back by the shirt and he still tries to get in the car. At that point the officer opened fire.



If you are the cop, what do you think is happening? It is about ten seconds from the time Blake gets up after being ordered not to, walks around the car after being told repeatedly by cops with their guns out to stop, before he opens his car door.

Ten seconds.

Is he getting his wallet? Is he going to get in the car and drive away? Or is he reaching for a pistol under the driver seat? The cops don't know and at that range you can't really wait for him to do whatever he is going to do.

Ten seconds is a long time when you are sitting in front of a computer watching a video, backing it up, watching it again.

When you are in a charged situation? Ten seconds is pretty quick.

I suppose the cops could have let him just drive away but that doesn't seem like good police work. Or they could have waited to see what he was getting from his car. I don't know about you but waiting until a guy turns and starts to shoot at me seems like a bad strategy for survival. So yes, he was shot in the back but there is a lot going on here that led up to that shooting.

As is usually the case, from Rashard Brooks to George Floyd to Jacob Blake, their death could have been easily avoided by simply complying with officer's commands. Yes, there are instances where even that doesn't prevent a shooting but generally in the overwhelming number of cases, simply complying with the police while they sort something out is going go a long way to avoiding being shot.

On the other hand, whether it was a good or bad shoot is irrelevant, as shown by the looting and rioting in Chicago when cops killed a black guy who was actively shooting at people.

As expected with the mainstream media and race hustlers on social media fanning the flames, rioting broke out across Kenosha.

Some ironic footage of a Unitarian Universalist "church" with "black Lives Matter" on their sign, in flames....



Less amusing, armed rioters facing off with a police armored vehicle.. Side note, this doesn't help the case for de-militarizing the police.



Waving your rifle around is going to get someone else shot.

Oh, and Mr. Blake has a criminal record including apparently being arrested before and found to have...a handgun under the seat of his vehicle. I am stunned by this revelation.


So another case of a shooting that is probably questionable but also probably, in a sane day and age, justifiable if unfortunate. Jacob Blake is not some innocent unarmed black man shot in the back, he is a violent criminal who was refusing to comply with order given by police for his safety and theirs, with a history of carrying guns in his car.

That isn't stopping the rioting. Little wonder when the mother effing governor of Wisconsin tweets this out:


"We don't have the details but allow me to disparage the police to placate my far Left base". Look at this fairy.


This thing is the governor of a state? When the cities of Wisconsin are burning, who will Tony Evers call upon to risk their lives to protect businesses and people? Oh that's right, the "merciless" police.

Not be outdone, fake black guy Shaun King tweeted a threatening post:


As usual, King isn't going to do anything. He is a pussy. But he can incite others, actual black men for example, to do his violent bidding for him. They don't need much of a push, nor do the antifa soyboys.

I agree with those who are warning that this might eclipse the George Floyd riots, as we are closer to the election. I think Tim Pool might be correct, this could get ugly.



I hope you aren't unprepared. It isn't like you haven't been warned.

Sunday, August 23, 2020

Who Is Going To Tell Him?

Something true of almost all small city journalists is that they desperately want to be taken seriously by their big city brethren (see also: sports reporters and teachers at religious schools). In 2020 the way you signal that you are a Super Serious Journalist is by writing garbage stories about "racism". So when a young Student Of Color at Manchester High School, in North Manchester, Indiana which is close to Fort Wayne, was the victim of a hateful hate crime of racist hate at school, the media jumped all over it. What happened to him? Was he jumped by two White guys shouting "this is MAGA country!"? Was he set on fire by four White Wisconsin frat boys? Did he find a noose in his garage?

No, even worse. He was sent home from school to change his shirt.

Damn. That is just like being lynched.

His mama ain't having it.

A mother is accusing Manchester High School of racial discrimination

This is the shirt her kid was wearing.....


His mama, a White woman named Dawn Eades, maybe should know enough to teach him that nobody is getting killed for being black in America and that most blacks who are killed are killed by other blacks, not "racist" Whites. After all his mama chooses to live in North Manchester which is 95% White and only around 1% black. If she is really afraid of her son Dondre getting killed because he is black, wouldn't it make sense to move somewhere with fewer White people?

Makes me wonder what his mama would think about a White student wearing a T-shirt that had this written on it:

"I Hope I Am Not One Of The White People Who Is A Victim Of Black Violent Crime Every 60 Seconds"

I suspect she wouldn't approve of that message even though it is factually accurate.

On the other hand, a brief review of Ms. Eades Facebook page reveals this charming message:


A cop not coming home at the end of their shift would imply they were killed in the line of duty. Apparently Ms. Eades is OK with that if the cop is "racist". Not only is she OK with it, she hopes that "racist" cops die in the line of duty.

What a lovely thought! She thinks "racist" cops deserve to die. One can only imagine what her little darling son thinks of cops.

Generations of blacks have been raised to believe that White people are dangerous and cops are out to get them. Even though that is easily debunked, it doesn't matter because it turns out that citing facts and statistics are White supremacy. All that matters is how something makes me feel.

Meanwhile the stories of black on White violent crime get little attention. The story of Cannon Hinnant drew a lot of attention but that is quickly fading as the media drops the story like a hot potato, only days after begrudgingly giving it any attention at all. Then last week came the story of a 17 year old old girl named Veronica Lee Baker who was found shot to death in her car. Arrests were soon made and the accompanying pictures are distressingly familiar....

Veronica Lee Baker
She was just 17 years old. Charged and arrested for her murder, another 17 year old named Devin Cordell Jones

Devin Cordell Jones
Also charged, three other teens: Keyshara Michelle Deans, 19, Nezyiha Zamir Collins, 19, and Tyreek Qumay Rodgers, 18. They allegedly helped Jones flee and are accessories after the fact.


According to Veronica's father, she and her alleged murderer knew one another and were friends. He also believes that this was a robbery gone bad.

A 17 year old White girl is dead. A 17 year old black male is her killer and now faces most of the rest of his life in prison. Three other black teens are facing felony charges as well. Minimal media coverage.

Then we have Dasean Damont Morris.

Dasean Damont Morris
Morris is 18 years old and charged with murdering a White father named Kyle Hagenbuch. Magenbuch was apparently out riding his motorcycle with friends when Morris drove past them, stopped and got out of his car, and fired into the group, striking Hagenbuch and killing him.

Again, very little media coverage.

On and on and on. The names change, the story doesn't.

But by all means, Dondre Eades should be super worried that the Klan is gonna git 'em while he attends his lily-White school.

Don't tell Dondre the truth, it might upset him.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

This Is Who They Are Going To Send To Take Our Guns?

If this is New York's "finest", I hate to think what law enforcement looks like in less demanding environments.

You might want to rethink that whole "forcible mandatory gun buy back" plan.


Thursday, August 20, 2020

Pedo-Flix

Unless you live under a rock, you probably saw some of the kerfuffle over an upcoming Netflix special titled "Cuties". In a surprise twist, there is nothing cute about the film but it might be the most 2020 movie yet. Let's do a count of the woke points!

From what I can tell, the movie is about a black ( ✅) Muslim ( ✅) immigrant ( ✅) family living in a poor neighborhood ( ✅) in France. The father is absent ( ✅). The main character is an 11 year old black girl ( ✅) named "Amy" played by an actual 11 year old girl named Fathia Youssouf. She starts off wearing a hijab ( ✅) but soon meets a free spirited neighbor ( ✅) who is part of a "dance troupe" called the Cuties. The film is directed by Maïmouna Doucouré, and she is a black Senegalese immigrant woman ( ✅)( ✅)( ✅)( ✅). "Amy" begins to cast off the repressive traditional faith of her family ( ✅) and find freedom in dancing provocatively ( ✅).

Yikes.

What really got Netflix noticed was this poster for the movie.


I believe all of the young girls pictured are 11 or 12 and yes they are all "twerking".

It is marketed as a "coming of age" story and an indictment of "hyper-sexualization" of young girls. That is probably a legitimate topic, even when fraught with peril, but according to reports the movie isn't intended for young girls....

Cuties has been classified as NC-17 - the strictest movie rating in the US, which bans anyone under the age of 18 from watching it  

NC-17 is basically dirty movies without actual sex scenes. So who is the audience here? Granted Netflix can be watched by anyone, so young girls can watch it but that doesn't seem to be who it is aimed at.

Who could this movie appeal to, filled with young girls dressed in skimpy outfits and dancing in sexually suggestive ways?

What is the message here? That being in a traditional religious family is repressive but dancing in a sexual manner, dressing like hookers, stealing money so you can go shopping for lingerie and flirting with older boys is great. One scene in the trailer is super disturbing....



You can see the size disparity, these are older teen boys "flirting" with 11 year old girls. How cute and charming!

Netflix has "apologized" but shows no sign of pulling the movie  This isn't new ground for Netflix, which has had other shows aimed at kids like "Twelve Forever" which included a slew of homosexual characters and was written by a woman who got in trouble for revealing a sexual relationship with a 14 year old; a show called "Big Mouth" that features adult voice actors talking about puberty and pre-teen genitalia; a show called "Girl" which is actually about a boy getting his genitals lopped off. There are more but you get the idea.

This is not natural and it is not normal. I get that there are all sorts of serious and emotional issues out there revolving around pre-teen angst and such, and there always has been, but this film seems to be targeted at the kind of people who like to sniff the hair of little girls / run for President.

The entertainment world isn't about entertainment. It isn't even about money. It is all about weaponizing popular culture to undermine Western civilization. Don't subsidize it, not just by not watching this garbage but by refusing to give these freaks any money for anything they produce.

Death By A Thousand Cuts

As a political observer and participant for three decades, I have seen a lot of political candidates, each with their own flavor. Ronald Reagan was all about morning in America and leading America in the Cold War against the existential threat of communism. Bill Clinton was a new kind of "centrist" Democrat, who was hip and could appeal to the young folks, especially chubby interns. George W. Bush was the compassionate conservative who was transformed by 9/11 into a war-time President. Barack Obama was the first homosexual mulatto black President and was supposed to usher in a new political paradigm. Trump promised to Make America Great again via political populism. Honestly, I don't remember what George H.W. Bush ran on, pretty much just that things were good under Reagan so why rock the boat?

While I have no idea what Trump is supposed to be basing his re-election on other than Biden being senile, Biden's plan as written by his staff promises fundamental changes, an unmaking of the political and cultural system of the United State and replacing it with a new, less free "progressive" vision. One of the Biden plan's main points is gun control, as I detailed here: The Future Of Gun Ownership (Or Lack Thereof). Unlike most other Democrats, who wanted gun control but weren't as overt about it, the Biden team has been quite open about their plan to disarm the American people. They are feeling confident about Joe winning and coming into office with a majority in both chambers, and likewise they are confident that once in office, they will stay there. I think they are probably right.

One of the critical pieces of the Biden plan that doesn't get as much attention as the promised ban on "assault weapons" is the scheme to reduce liability protection for firearms manufacturers that sell a legal product that is later used in the commission of a crime. From the above linked post:

As I pointed out, this is the very first proposal for gun control on Biden's webpage. It seems odd at first, why wouldn't they lead with something sexier like an "assault weapons" ban?

The reason is pragmatic and it is first because people who are serious people that understand how things work know that an "assault weapons" ban would face all sorts of court challenges that could drag on for years. Taking away the liability protection? That would have an immediate impact that looks like this:

Families of Sandy Hook massacre victims say Remington bankruptcy intentionally leaves them in the cold

The Remington Arms Co. appears on the verge of being sold off in pieces following its second Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in just over two years.

It is an inauspicious fate for the 204-year-old company, which bills itself as America’s oldest gun manufacturer. But civil liability claimants who helped drive the company to this point allege that Remington’s attempt to auction itself off is deliberately crafted to deny them the compensation they say they are owed.

The federal judge overseeing the bankruptcy case, Clifton R. Jessup in Decatur, Alabama, has scheduled a hearing for Tuesday on whether to approve the process, which would see Remington’s various businesses — which operate under the umbrella Remington Outdoor Co. — auctioned off as soon as Sept. 8.

A business in operation for over 200 years is about to be chopped up and sold off in pieces because a loon shot up a school with a legally available firearm.

This will be the fate of firearms and ammo manufacturers, one after another. This is by design.

Lawsuits can be ruinous to a business. Something like the Sandy Hook shooting, a criminal act be a deranged man, can drag on for years and be an enormous expense. The Sandy Hook shooting happened in 2012 and 8 years later the lawyers are still trying to get money from Remington, a company with over 3,500 employees.

While the big fight will be over the "assault weapons" ban, the quiet undermining of the industry will happen in court rooms as gun manufacturers, ammo supplies, gun dealers, credit card companies, anyone lawyers can connect to a shooting are all targeted. Forcing the industry to go out of business serves the same purpose as a ban on new production.

Remington is just the beginning.

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

A Wild Unicorn Appears!

In the endless series of mass shootings in America, every once in a while we see that rare bird, a White guy doing the shooting. When I see one, I like to report it because it is so rare and just to show that I don't cherry pick when I talk about mass shootings. So here goes from way down in Texas!


LCSO: Dispute over dogs may have led to mass shooting in Dayton that left three dead, two injured

Apparently Michael Wettstein was mad about dogs running loose in the area. Obviously the solution is to kill people.

Mr. Wettstein has had previous run-ins with the law and killed three people and wounded two others, along with at least one dog. More fun facts:

At the time of Wettstein’s arrest on Monday, he had drawn a swastika on his forehead and was armed with a shotgun and rifle that reportedly were used in the shootings.

Oh, OK. This guy isn't a whack-a-doodle or anything.

I'll go on a limb and assume that mental illness and/or substance abuse were somehow connected to this story.

Still it was a mass shooting and the shooter was White.

Urban Death Traps

A theme I have pushed for most of the last few years is the idea of bugging out right now, rather than waiting until SHTF and then trying to escape with your tactical backpack packed with clean socks and some energy bars. This picture kind of captures that mindset.



A lot of people think that when things get bad enough, they will hop in their car, which will conveniently be full of gas, and head out of town on the highway, which will conveniently be congestion-free and arrive at their designated bug-out location safe and sound.

Think again.

Cars give people a sense of invulnerability. You are surrounded by a steel frame, windows and locked doors. You can control the temperature, listen to the radio and the rain doesn't bother you. You have seat belts and airbags. You are invincible!

Except you aren't.

Modern vehicles especially are fragile, full of sensitive electronics that are great for comfort when driving on the highway but crap for resisting being disabled. I am not even talking about someone shooting the engine block with a .50 Barrett, just a regular firearm can disable a car. 15-20 rounds from an AR or AK, or a few slugs from a 12 gauge, into the front of a car will shut it down. Maybe not immediately but you won't get far once a FMJ round punches holes in your radiator or even just the radiator hose or one of the belts. Look under your hood sometime. There is thin sheet metal on the sides and usually a plastic grill in the front. Those aren't going to stop a high velocity round. The whole inside of your engine is full of sensitive crap. This is the engine of the 2018 Honda Accord, picked at random because it is a popular car:



I am not a mechanic and I don't know what even a quarter of that stuff is at a glance but I am pretty sure if you put holes in most of that stuff, the car will stop. Maybe not for a mile or two but it will come to a halt.

Tires are easy to disable, one round through the sidewall or even a puncture from a knife will leave you with a flat in a matter of seconds. You can drive on a flat but not very fast.

Of course, roads are pretty easy to block with other cars or debris. Bottom line, that car is only useful until someone makes a concerted effort to stop it. Once you are stopped, you are dead.

Windows are easy to break. Try to drive with the windshield smashed up. A brick or a baseball bat can wreck a side window fairly easily. Most modern cars will unlock the doors automatically if you are in park, and shifting into park is your natural impulse when you stop. That seatbelt you think will protect you in a crash will also trap you. If you have kids, you know how hard it can be to maneuver around to smack them when you are in a bucket seat and belted in. Kids know it too. Even if you can hold your own in a stand-up fight, you are in trouble if your assailant is outside of the car and you are inside. Even if you have a gun, have you practiced drawing your gun and shooting while adrenaline is pumping from a seated position? I haven't.

As long as you are in motion, you are in a relatively safe spot although again a windshield can be shattered with a brick and it won't stop a bullet. The problem is that cars are easy to stop and once you stop, you are vulnerable. The guy in Portland named Adam Haner was chased by a mob until he crashed his car and then a mob of black Lives Matter "mostly peaceful protesters" dragged him out of his vehicle and assaulted him until a man named Marquise Love kicked him in the head. Haner is apparently recovering but a blow like that to the head is possible fatal. When you add in improvised weapons like bats and other blunt objects? Like Herschel says: A Baseball Bat Carried By Antifa Mobs Is A Lethal Weapon. More and more we are seeing Leftist mobs armed with actual firearms and whether they know how to use them or not, that is still a significant escalation.

It might seem like there are lots of roads out of town but especially in larger metro areas it is easy to block them off. A little over a week ago, there was mass looting in Chicago, triggered by a black guy being shot by police after he was first shooting at them. Clearly unjust. The police ordered the bridges raised to keep more looters from arriving and the highways were mostly closed but that goes both ways. If things get out of hand and major thoroughfares are locked down, that leaves you trying to navigate the side streets and those are way easier to block off. An average city street has cars already parked along at least one side, a van or pickup truck parked sideways would block them completely.

It is hazardous driving through urban areas under the best of circumstances but under a SHTF scenario? It wouldn't take long for you to find yourself trapped.

My advice as it pertains to cities?

If you live in an urban area, I don't care how good your job is, quit and move out of the area. Do it now. The longer you wait, the more likely you are to get trapped and the harder it will be to sell your place. You can find another job, but your sweet benefits package won't mean much if you are dead or a vegetable hooked to a ventilator because some activist caved in your skull.

Unless you can't avoid it, stay the hell out of urban areas. Malls, sporting events, whatever. If it can be reached easily via public transit or walking, stay out. Is it fair or right that we can't safely go to the cities we built? Of course not but crying about it doesn't change reality. Being outraged isn't a defense against a violent mob.

If you must go? Obviously you should be legally carrying, something you are comfortable with and familiar with shooting. If possible something with a capacity over 10 rounds. Probably a good idea to carry at least one extra magazine. Know where you are going before you leave your house, and by that I mean don't just rely on the GPS. Look at a map, get a feel for the area. Is there a river or some natural barrier that restricts your exit? If you need to leave in a hurry, which way should you be going? It might not be the most direct route. For example, this is downtown Fort Wayne, the only city I regularly spend time in.


I live northeast of this area so my most direct route is to go that direction.

Two issues.

First, the Maumee and St Joseph rivers are in the way and there are only a couple of ways across those rivers to go east.

Second, the area that I would have to go through is very "diverse". Most of the time it is fine because they are busy shooting each other but if the SHTF? A White guy driving alone or worse with my family is going to look like easy pickings. Sure I can shoot my way out but they might have guns as well, and someone outside of a car shooting in is in a better position than someone inside of a car shooting out. Plus my family might get hit.

Third, Fort Wayne is easy to get around if you are going north-south, not so much going east-west.

So depending on where I am, it might make more sense to go north on one of the major road ways and then go east. Or I might even be better off going south to get out of town and then going cross country to get home. Fort Wayne is pretty densely populate to the north but south of downtown it turns into corn fields in a hurry and people who live near corn fields are most likely my kind of people.

Where you park is also important. Don't park too far from where you will be and try to avoid parking garages. A parking garage can become impossible to get out of in a hurry and as fraught with problems as your car is, it beats trying to walk out of a city on foot.

Be sure your car has plenty of gas and is in good working order. Even if you are able to get out of a city, bad traffic can happen and you don't want to have to wander around looking for gas or worse yet running out. More than once I have encountered bad traffic and started running low on fuel, leading me to get off the expressway and into some sketchy neighborhoods where the clerk is behind bulletproof glass. Don't drive anywhere near an urban area without a full tank of gas.

I am not a tactical expert so these are just some basic ideas.

The key here is to know where you are and know where you would go if things went sideways. As always the best course of action is to stay away from those sorts of areas but we all have to go to the store or government offices.

Your mindset needs to be that large urban areas are hostile territory. Not that you shouldn't be in certain neighborhoods after dark but that the whole area is dangerous. They are concrete death traps full of people who might decide to rob, hurt or kill you.

The times we are entering are going to require a radical rethinking of our mindset. Millions of people in this country see you as their mortal enemy, as "fascists" who need to be punched or killed. In their online echo chambers they are talking themselves into justifying violence and murder. Zero Hedge ran a story the other day about a guy named Khaled Alqahtani at Berkeley making the case for political violence and rejecting the once sainted names of Gandhi and MLK: "This War Can't Be Civil": Berkeley Columnist Calls For "Violent Resistance". The fact that a guy named Khaled Alqahtani is clamoring for the violent overthrow of the society his family chose to come to because it wasn't like wherever the hell he came from is not lost on me. Nor is how hilarious his picture is:


Watch it boys, we have ourselves a badass here! That mustache is throbbing with masculine energy.

Anyway, these times are going to suck but they are going to suck a lot more for people that aren't prepared for them. We no longer live in the United States of America. We aren't united in any sense at all, and one half of the country hates the other half. The time has come to start viewing those who hate us not as misguided fellow Americans but enemies who want to see you and your family silenced, disenfranchised, punished for 150 year old "crimes" and if at all possible dead.

You are soon going to find out how far you are willing to go. If your path is blocked by an angry mob, are you going to stop knowing they might pull you out of your car or are you going to drive through them? If you get stopped and they try to get you out of the car, knowing that if they do your life is in mortal peril, do you let that happen or do you defend yourself with lethal force? If some scrawny social worker with a couple of bLM thugs comes to your house under orders from President Kamala Harris and demands you surrender your firearms, do you give them up or do you do what has to be done?

Many of our choices are being made for us and they are intentionally narrowing your options down. Slowly but surely parts of our nation are being declared off-limits to normal Americans. At some point we will have to return the favor.

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

Fleeing Is Not An Option

Saw a great quote today and one that rings true in 2020. What will you choose?


The Time Grows Short My Friends

Under three months until election day. A doddering fool who was never very smart to begin with picks an empty shell as his running mate. Kamala will do whatever she is told in order to gain and retain power, just ask Downtown Willie Brown. Biden is leading in the polls all over the place and while I understand the inherent problem with polling in 2020, demographic changes plus a media that learned their lesson plus what will certainly be widespread voter fraud equals a tough road for Trump's re-election, assuming he even wants to be re-elected. Kamala Harris is a wet dream for the anti-2nd Amendment crowd and old politicians who have a hankering for younger skanks alike.

The general ammo shortage shows no signs of abating and if anything prices continue to skyrocket. The manufacturers I work with who produce AR-15s are telling me that they are months out on production. For example, CMMG who makes premier quality ARs and the Banshee PCC is at least 12 weeks out on production....



12 weeks from today is November 9th, almost a week after the election. Rock River Arms, another higher end manufacturer of AR-15s, is running 90 days out on AR uppers. In other words, if you don't have your orders in pretty soon, there is a decent chance you won't get them until next year and by that time Biden could be sworn in and that could quickly be the end of the AR industry.

Meanwhile violence continues unabated across the country, hidden from view by the media but there nevertheless.

Portland has been dealing with nightly riots for months and a motorist was nearly beaten to death a few days ago. American citizens are facing the grim choice between getting dragged from the car and given the Reginald Denny treatment or using lethal force to protect themselves and likely facing arrest for doing so. Getting kicked in the head or hit with a blunt object is often lethal so I know which option I will choose.

City after city reports record breaking violent crime. We know about the rampant crime in places like Chicago, Baltimore and St. Louis but now it is spreading to other, smaller cities.

In Cincinnati, Ohio where I worked for a number of years, there were 18 people shot in 4 incidents overnight Saturday with four people killed. This is just part of the trend in Cincinnati in 2020.

There have been 110 more shootings in Cincinnati this year when compared with 2019 to date. There have been at least 326 fatal and nonfatal shootings in Cincinnati this year, a 55% increase compared with the same period last year. 

Shootings have been elevated all year. Homicides are also up. Sunday's killings bring the total to at least 65. Last year at this time, there had been 46 homicides. 

Cinci has always had some trouble spot, like Over-The-Rhine, but these numbers are huge in what is usually a quiet city. At this rate, Cincinnati will have more shootings that any year since 1971, the year I was born.

A friend in Louisville, Kentucky reports that L'ville has more murders already in 2020 than all of 2019 with more than four months to go in 2020. Carjackings are also skyrocketing.

In Denver, Colorado the story is the same:

The city is on course to have the highest number of homicides seen in the city in a single year since 2004, data collected by The Denver Post shows. Fifty-eight people have died in homicides so far this year, including seven who have died in shootings and stabbings on Federal Boulevard.

Philadelphia has been a slaughterhouse all year:

7 Dead, 25 Hurt in 25 Shootings During Another Violent Weekend in Philadelphia

It was yet another violent weekend for Philadelphia plagued by the highest number of homicides the city has seen up to this point in more than 13 years. 

Deputy Managing Director Vanessa Garrett Harley, the city’s top official for violence prevention, and Temple University gun policy researcher Jason Gravel told NBC10 that they believe the COVID-19 pandemic could be compounding a gun violence epidemic that has been getting worse in recent years.

Lots of these stories quote the cops as saying that coronavirus is the reason that shootings are up, not that police pulling back has emboldened the criminals. We all know better.

In nearby Fort Wayne, the numbers are grim. I pulled this from the webpage of the Fort Wayne police department:


The increase in charges for assault and arson are likely tied to the "mostly peaceful protests"/riots and looting over the summer but murder is way up. My post in January looking at homicides in Fort Wayne, The Color Of Crime In Fort Wayne, identified 29 people murdered in Fort Wayne/Allen in 2019. We are going to blow right past that number in 2020.

Just as a note, I didn't look very hard for this information but most people don't really know this is going on. They think things are bad in whatever city they are near but that it is isolated when in fact it is almost universal.

What do you think things are going to be like in a few months? One of two things will happen:

1. Trump wins re-election against all the odds. 

If Trump wins again, the Left, having been thwarted time and again in trying to reverse the election of 2016, will go crazy. They know that Ruth Bader Ginsburg won't make it four more years. I would expect serious violence to break out across the country and I wouldn't be surprised to see an attempt at a violent coup. The Secret Service is good but if 2000 armed antifa storm the White House gates, what would they do? It wouldn't surprise me if the military was quietly put on standby on election night, just in case. Regardless of the winning margin, the Left will claim the election is illegitimate. States and cities might stop recognizing Federal authority. Bottom line, the Left won't tolerate a Trump win. They can't.

2. Biden/Harris wins

If placeholder Joe wins, I have been predicting pogroms of vengeance against White, middle-America Trump voters. It would surprise me if we didn't have some sort of false flag mass shooting involving the rare White male shooter by the end of the year or early into next year to give political cover for politicians to pass a new "assault weapons" ban.

When AR/AK rifles are banned, if the ban includes a ban on current owners, it will become a test of wills. Citizens won't surrender these rifles, nor handguns with "high capacity magazines". Will the government try to force the issue, leading to bloodshed and mass revolt, or will the government let people thumb their noses at the Feds?

Either way, the unrest is just getting started and with less than 90 days until the most contentious election in my lifetime, you are running short of time.

Monday, August 17, 2020

Uhboleish Teh Ay Tee Eff!

Recently I posted this on Twitter....


As a Gary Johnson voter in 2012 and 2016, I know all of the arguments in favor of voting Libertarian. I also realize that while Libertarianism sounds good in social media arguments, in the real world it falls apart because it utterly fails to understand human nature and refuses to dwell in the real world.

Gary Johnson had his ardent supporters but his support was more philosophical than personality driven. As the nominee in 2016, he was in a perfect position. Both major party candidates were very weak, Trump carries a ton of baggage and Hillary is completely unlikable and corrupt. If ever there was a time for a third party candidate to shine, it was 2016. Johnson's campaign did OK with 3.5% of the vote but it was barely a blip on the radar in the big picture.

Since 2016 the national Libertarian Party has imploded into a vortex of weirdness. The kooks and crackpots are running the show and more serious libertarians have either abandoned the Libertarian Party or abandoned libertarianism entirely. That has left behind only the nutjobs. I wouldn't care but I am seeing a handful of fanatical, and that is an accurate term, supporters of Jo Jorgensen popping up on social media groups, especially firearms and 2nd Amendment groups.

Their bullshit is always the same "Muh bump-stockz!" and "Jo will abolish the ATF!".

The bump stock ban was obviously a mistake. Following the Las Vegas shooting, and weird we still know next  to nothing about what motivated Stephen Paddock, the NRA signaled support for regulations on bump stocks. This was likely a P.R. and pragmatic move, the understandable concern was that a bill to ban bump stocks was preferable to more sweeping regulations. A few months after the NRA signaled support, Trump ordered the ATF to basically ban bump stocks. It is safe to assume that essentially no one who owned a bump stock turned them in or destroyed them.

Bump stocks are toys, gimmicks. I have been around firearms my entire life and had never heard of them until the Las Vegas shooting. Banning them was still a mistake but that same year, 2018, both Trump and Pence spoke at the NRA annual meeting in Dallas and then the following year they both spoke at the NRA annual meeting in Indianapolis, which I attended but not the speech by the President or VP.

Do you think Joe Biden or Kamala Harris will speak at the NRA annual meeting in 2021 if they win?

There hasn't been a President as vocally supportive of the 2nd Amendment in my lifetime. He hasn't done as much as I would have liked to advance gun rights but in general he has been a friend of gun owners.

Biden? I have already killed many pixels detailing the Biden gun control plan: The Future Of Gun Ownership (Or Lack Thereof). Bottom line, it is sweeping in scope and aggressive in stamping out individual gun rights.

One of two people will be sworn in as President in January. Donald Trump or Joe Biden. Option A or Option B.

You don't have to like that we only have two choices but we do. We live in a nation of over 350 million people. In 2016 about half voted for Donald Trump and a few more voted for Hillary Clinton. A few million people voted third party but that made little difference in the outcome of the election.

Don't get sucked in by the "Abolish the ATF!" rhetoric. Jo Jorgensen isn't going to abolish the ATF because she is never going to be President. Ever.

There is no plausible or even implausible scenario in which Jo Jorgensen gets enough votes to win even a single state like New Hampshire or Montana, low population and generally independent minded. There isn't even a scenario where she gets 10% of the vote in a small state. In 2016 Gary Johnson got over 5% of the vote in 9 states but didn't break 10% in any state. The most populous state he broke 5% in was Colorado with 2.7 million votes cast and Johnson pulled 5.18% of the vote. Big states like Ohio, Texas and Florida? Right around 3%. Something else worth considering...


Maine has a goofy split electoral college vote so they are on there twice but what else is noticeable is that of the 9 states Gary Johnson got more than 5% of the vote only two, Colorado and New Mexico where Johnson was governor, voted for Hillary. The other six are Trump states.

I am hearing a lot of Gary Johnson voters who, like me, are done with the Libertarian party and are likely to vote for Trump. I have written elsewhere about Jo Jorgensen and her advocacy for de facto open borders ( Those Wacky Libertarians! ) and her praise of black Lives Matter ( The Libertarian Case For Marxism! ) and I would be very surprised if Jo doesn't get a much smaller percentage of the vote than Gary Johnson in 2016.

She is not going to "win", not in any sense but she might pull enough votes from Trump in critical states to flip states like Michigan to Biden. I guess that electing a globalist puppet with dementia, a mere place-holder for Kamala Harris who is even worse, is a "victory" for liberty or something.

Libertarianism is an example of the perfect being the enemy of the good. There are not many actual libertarians in America and there are certainly not enough to win elections, at least not elections of any significance. We are left with a choice between a Republican who is sometimes inconsistent but generally very pro-2nd Amendment or an empty suit with Alzheimers who has already promised to lay waste to the 2nd Amendment. Sure it sounds great to get rid of the NFA and disband the ATF but that isn't going to happen. There is no political will to do so and there is no chance Jo is going to get elected.

This election is critical and while I think Trump is going to lose, if he is to have any chance he is going to need gun owners to show up and vote for him. If you support the 2nd Amendment but vote for Jo Jorgensen, you are either naive or dumb or both. She isn't going to repeal the NFA. She isn't going to abolish the ATF. She isn't going to do those things because she isn't going to be President.

Jo Jorgensen's small but vocal fanatical supporters really are as loony and immune to common sense as King James Only zealots. They would be best ignored but unfortunately they might convince enough voters to join their delusions to ensure the end of private firearms ownership in America.

Things are too dangerous in America to play "what if" in this election.


Friday, August 14, 2020

This Is Outrageous!

Almost two months later and the dastardly White frat boys who lit bi-racial teen Althea Bernstein on fire have not been apprehended!

Police still mum on investigation in alleged hate crime, 7 weeks later

Seven weeks after a biracial woman told police she had been sprayed with lighter fluid by a group of white men and then set on fire, police and the woman’s family say the investigation into the incident continues.

But little information about the June 24 incident has been released as the Madison police and the FBI continue to investigate. Madison police spokesman Joel DeSpain said Wednesday that he regularly checks with the lead detective on the case, along with the department’s Violent Crimes Unit, and said it is still an active investigation.

“There is nothing new to release at this time,” DeSpain said.

This is obviously a massive cover-up by Madison police. How hard can it be to find video evidence or witnesses to identify four White frat boys, two with Hawaiian shirts, the uniform of the notorious Boogaloo Movement, and two dressed all in black. One would think someone, anyone, on a busy street in the heart of Madison, Wisconsin would have seen something! Clearly the White people in Madison, known as a bastion of White supremacy and right wing extremism, are keeping silent and erasing video footage to provide cover for this hate crime.

Andrea Love Sumpter, an attorney who is acting as a spokeswoman for Bernstein and her family, said Wednesday in an email that Madison police “are still in regular contact and actively investigating the case.”

Bernstein, she said, “continues to deal with the trauma she experienced day by day.”

A month ago, she said she had advised the family against making statements to avoid compromising the work of investigators.

Rightly so. The poor thing, lit on fire by White frat boys. She might never recover. Perhaps she should sue every fraternity in Wisconsin, just in case. Obviously in this kind of case where a vicious hate crime has happened but there are no leads, the thing to do is to hush up the family because that only seems suspicious to you racists out there.

When will it end? How long must my oppressed beautiful, strong and brave fellow citizens have to endure hate crimes at the hands of frat boys?

Justice for Althea!

Wednesday, August 12, 2020

Kamala "Kneepads" Harris Enters The Race!

The big political news yesterday was the long awaited annoucement of who Joe Biden picked as his running mate: Kamala "Kneepads" Harris. Obviously we all know that Joe can't even pick which flavor of pudding to have for dinner so this choice was made for him but we'll pretend he had some say in the matter.

Harris brings....well, not very much to the ticket. She is from California where she isn't all that popular and that state is already locked up for Biden. Far left liberals don't like her much because she was once attorney general of California and was apparently too enthusiastic about locking up criminals and criminals tend to be non-White. I think that is what an attorney general is supposed to do but maybe the job description is different in the land of fruits and nuts. She is kind of unlikable to boot. What she brings are two things. First she has a vagina, which used to mean you were a woman and Biden promised to have a woman on the ticket. Second she is "black". That is a bit of a stretch.

Her full name is Kamala Devi Harris and her parents are a little bit unusual. Her mom, Shyamala Gopalan, is Tamil and from India. She died of colon cancer in 2009 but prior to that was a cancer researcher and has her doctorate from Berkeley. Her father, Donald J. Harris, is Jamaican although he is fairly light skinned and he also has a PhD from Berkeley, his in economics.

So she is at least partly black, and half Indian.

What Kamala is most famous for is her willingness to leverage sex to get a jumpstart in the political world. In 1994, at age 30, Kamala started dating Willie Brown who was the speaker of the state assembly and a major player in the Democrat party in California. Brown was also married, although seperated, and was the ripe old age of 60, making him only 30 years older than Kamala Harris.


Harris was reasonably attractive at 30 and pretty successful already as a prosecutor in Alameda County. You would assume she would have no problem attracting boyfriends that were at least in the same general age as her. Instead she shacked up with a guy born 7 years before the U.S. entry into World War II. Maybe it was true love. More likely it was an ambitious woman doing what many ambitious women have done time and time again: offering her body to a powerful man to get ahead in the world. This is a good article from last year on what Harris trading sex for favors got her:

Kamala Harris launched political career with $120K 'patronage' job from boyfriend Willie Brown

The gist is this. She landed a position in 1994, shortly after she started whoring herself dating Willie Brown on the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board which paid the 30 year old $97,000 annually (adjusted for inflation that is about $167,000). That job sounds incredibly boring and probably took up too much of her time, she she quit a job paying almost one hundred grand after only five months and was promptly given a spot on the California Medical Assistance Commission. This was more like it. The commission was made up mostly of old political figures who were getting a cushy payback for years of loyalty and it only met twice a month. She still managed to miss about 20% of the meetings and according to the linked story, Harris was three decades younger than anyone else on the commission, not to mention having zero background in health care. Still, she got paid $70,000 per year. Doing the math, and ignoring that she missed one in five meetings, that means that even if the twice monthly meetings lasted ten hours, very unlikely, she only worked 240 hours per year in this job. At $70,000 annual pay, that comes to almost $300/hour. She must have been very...accommodating....in the sack with Willie to score that kind of gig. She was on the commission from 1994 to 1998.

So if she worked a couple of days a month and made $70,000 for it, what did she do the rest of her time, besides sleeping with Willie Brown? She was in her early 30s and pulling down a huge amount of money for essentially no work, and even then she barely showed up. What did she do the rest of the time? No idea.

Willie Brown broke up with her a few years after they started dating when he was elected mayor of San Francisco and started dating a 32 year old White woman named Carolyn Carpeneti. Carpeneti must have been even more exciting in the sack, as Willie Brown helped her land positions that paid "at least $2.33 million over the past five years by nonprofit groups and political committees controlled by the mayor and his allies". He eventually left her and his daughter by her and shacked up with an even younger White girl from Russia named Sonya Molodetskaya who is 38 years his junior.

That is a lot of not very important information but it does give you a glimpse at the way that Kamala Harris operates. From her humble beginnings she leveraged sex to make connections in the California political world that led to her becoming California's Attorney General for six years before being elected to the United States Senate from California in 2016, the year Trump won the Presidency.

She is not the least accomplished person on a major party Presidential ticket, that honor goes to Barack Obama who did nothing of note prior to becoming President but like Kamala Harris, I suspect Barack Obama also had sex with men to advance his political career. Harris at least was a district attorney and California's attorney general where she was known for being reasonably tough on crime, something upsetting to liberals and libertarians alike. Although now that you mention it, it is getting pretty hard to tell liberals and libertarians apart on most issues. For example, fake black guy Shaun King swore he wouldn't support Kamala Harris or Joe Biden but that didn't last long:



I would try to explain the hypocrisy here but Shaun isn't even smart enough to know what race he is. Meanwhile the left-libertarians are hyperventilaing because Kamala Harris put criminals in prison.

Kamala Harris Is a Cop Who Wants To Be President

Oh no, not a cop! Of course Reason magazine (😆) is using "cop" as a slur for people in authority. One example they use is the infamous "three strikes" law and a guy she used the law to try to get him the third strike 25-to-life in prison. According to Reason, it was a "non-violent" third offense but the third offense was a felon in possession of a handgun. Also it seemed from the context that the prior conviction was for some sort of violent sex crime. A violent sex crime felon who is caught with a handgun is just another violent felony waiting to happen. Throw him in jail or better yet string him up. But Reason thinks we should have people like that wandering around.

Like I said, the libertarian party, especially under the "leadership" of Open Border Jo Jorgensen and idiot court jester Spike Cohen, is getting pretty hard to distinguish from garden variety liberals. I guess they missed the part where American cities are burning because most people don't give a shit about the Non-Aggression Principle.

We also know that Kamala Harris is a big anti-gun type, which is predictable since she is from California. David Codrea has a good piece up on her anti-gun rhetoric, including "red flag" laws aimed at disarming "racists"

Biden Naming Harris as VP Pick Poses Special Threat for Gun Owners

I have mentioned this before.

- The use of the "public health crisis" has been invoked to shut down churches in spite of the First Amendment guarantee of the right to free exercise of religion, which generally involves public worship.

- Many places are declaring "racism" to be a "public health crisis" even though it is neither a crisis nor an issue of public health.

- If you can violate the First Amendment based on a "public health crisis", you can do the same for the Second Amendment.

In other words, if you don't toe the line on race and that line is always moving, you are considered a "racist" and there is a good chance you will have your guns seized.

So yeah, on pretty much every issue she is a disaster but what did you expect from the people pulling Joe Biden's strings?

What will be interesting is to see how this dynamic plays out. Normally the VP candidates are attack dogs, saying stuff that the top of the ticket is avoiding, but their main purpose is to not hurt the Presidential candidate. With Biden losing his marbles and unable to be trusted to speak in public, I see Kamala carrying the bulk of the public appearances for the ticket, calling on people to vote for the guy she expects to replace shortly after he takes office.

Since Pence has the charisma of a bag of rice, this race is shaping up to be Trump versus Kamala, with Pence simply observing and Biden unaware he is running for President.

It should be interesting, although one advantage Trump has is his willingness to shit all over women who are his political opponents instead of trying to be gallant and gentlemanly. I expect to see some heated exchanges between those two. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised to see Harris stand in for Joe in the debates, assuming there are any debates in 2020.

Harris doesn't really help Biden other than by fulfilling the demand that he pick a "woman of color" to be his running mate but she doesn't really hurt him. No one on the Left is going to stay home and miss their chance to secure a place in heaven by voting against Orange Man Bad and she won't really inspire more Republicans to show up to vote like a Stacy Abrams would have.

If nothing else, we are guaranteed a lot great memes.