Some nation is going to figure out that opening a refuge for white people from the U.S. and Western Europe is going to be a huge plus for them. Russia has endless space, imagine the economic boon to them of offering homesteads to the heritage populations of America and Europe?— Arthur Sido (v. 2.0) (@SidoArthur) July 31, 2019
The article referenced is from Yahoo! news, Inside Huawei’s $1.5 billion ‘European town’ campus in China. It is interesting that the CEO of this huge Chinese company (320,000 employees, revenue over $100 billion) doesn't want to think of his company as Chinese:
“When you are here, you might notice that Huawei is not like a Chinese company at all. Except for our canteens and all the Chinese faces, it's more like a Western company,” he told Yahoo Finance in an exclusive interview. “We have absorbed the good, advanced elements of Western culture. Isn't our corporate culture like Protestant culture?”
Interesting. The point that I found more interesting was the idea that China might be building "replicant cities" that look European as a refuge for whites. With Europe, the U.S. and Canada careening headlong toward demographic doomsday, a lot of people are going to be looking for a way out.
I was kind of skeptical, after all China is the world's most populous country and already has around 1.4 billion people, although India is close behind them in terms of total population. However China is also the fourth largest nation in the world with 3,700,000 square miles of territory and they are surprisingly ranked 59th on the list of population density with a density of 376 per square mile, a lot compared to the U.S. (ranked 146th, 87 per square mile) but much lower than nations like Germany (601 per square mile), the UK (710 per square mile) and Japan (965 per square mile). Granted, much of China proper is not very hospitable including The Taklamakan Desert which is almost as big as Germany. Not to mention the authoritarian and brutal Communist government and very alien culture would make China less than ideal as a refuge. But there are other places to consider.
The one that jumps out at me is Russia. Now Russia is supposed to be scary and all, but the people are white with a mostly culturally Christian heritage. It is Orthodoxy which is a little goofy seeming to Westerners but better than Islam. What is more critical is that Russia has thus far resisted the suicidal tendencies of Western Europe, Canada and the U.S. and is the largest country in the world in terms of total area at over 6.6 million square miles, almost double the area of 2nd place Canada and 3rd place U.S. While the U.S. has some 330 million people, Russia has less than half that number at 147 million and is way down the list of nations ranked by birth rate, coming in at 137th with only 12.6 births per thousand people. That leads to Russia having a very low population density, one of the lowest in the world, of only 23 per square mile, about a quarter of the density of the U.S. and coming in at 181st out of 194 nations with significant populations.
It is hard to fathom how large Russia is. To drive from the capitol Moscow in the East to Vladivostok on the Muravyov-Amursky Peninsula on the far west extreme (home of the Russian Pacific fleet) is a trip of 5,674 miles, 5 days solid of non-stop driving. For comparison purposes, driving from New York to L.A. is **only** 2,790 miles. I once drove from Cheyenne, Wyoming to Toledo, Ohio, a 1200 mile trip, in a straight shot and it about killed me. Now multiply that trip by a factor of more than 4.5 and there is no Cabelas store near the end to look forward to.
Russia is huge but it also is pretty far north and much of the interior of the country is uninhabited for a reason, being swamp or tundra. That isn't insurmountable, you could easily drop 20 million people in Russia in the more southerly areas. Krasnodar is in southern Russia near the Black Sea and has temperatures pretty close to American cities like Cincinnati, not terribly cold in the winter and pretty warm in July and August. Much of Russia from satellite views looks like the U.S. Midwest. Tons of acres of farm fields with small towns mixed in. Russia could easily set aside large areas of countryside for Americans and Europeans to settle in and build our own towns and cities as part of the Russian federation. When you consider the vast natural resources of Russia, it becomes a nation that could dominate the 21st century if it has enough people.
Another less obvious ark to save Western civilization from the demographic flood is the nation of Uruguay. Uruguay is a small South American nation on the southeast coast of the continent, nestled between Brazil to the north and Argentina to the west and south. Uruguay has a lot of recommend it as an ark. The population is around 88% white, predominantly from southern Europe (Spain and Italy). The other 12% is 8% mestizo and 4% black. Religiously, about 50% of Uruguayans are Christian, mostly Catholic as you would expect. About 42% are non-religious. Jews make up less than one-half on one percent of the population and even better there is essentially zero Islamic presence in the country. According to Infogalactic, there are likely less than 1000 Muslims in the entire country, or 0.02 percent with no actual mosques. That is still too high but that is a tiny number hard for anyone to beat. More from Infogalactic:
Uruguay is ranked first in Latin America in democracy, peace, lack of corruption, quality of living, e-Government, and equally first in South America when it comes to press freedom, size of the middle class and prosperity.... It ranks second in the region on economic freedom, income equality, per-capita income and inflows of FDI. Uruguay is the third-best country on the continent in terms of HDI, GDP growth, innovation and infrastructure. It is regarded as a high-income country (top group) by the UN, the only one in Latin America. Uruguay is also the third-best ranked in the world in e-Participation. Uruguay is an important global exporter of combed wool, rice, soybeans, frozen beef, malt and milk.
Uruguay is the polar opposite of what we think of when we think of South American nations. That is no doubt the result of a mostly European descended population. Compare Uruguay with Venezuela where over half of the population is mestizo and the contrast could hardly be more stark.
Uruguayans speak Spanish, mixed with some Italian to form a dialect called "Cocoliche" but English is pretty common in business and Spanish is a lot easier language to learn than Russian. The climate is temperate and pretty decent. As you can see, it is a pretty lush and verdant nation with over 400 miles of coastline.
The capitol city of Uruguay, Montevideo, is a big city of 1.3 million people which is more than 1/3 of the total population of Uruguay of 3.4 million. A number of other decent sized cities run along the coast of the country, many being actual suburbs of Montevideo. When you get away from the coast, it starts to get a lot more wide open.
Meandering around the satellite view on Google maps shows lots of unoccupied land. While Uruguay is a relatively small country of only 68,000 square miles, slightly smaller than Missouri, it also has a very small population of only 3.4 million people, ranking Uruguay 133rd in the world in population. That means that the population density of Uruguay is only 44 per square mile. Since 1/3 of the people live in one city, that means that the density in the rest of the country is really, really light.
I am not sure how many Americans and Europeans you could resettle in Uruguay because of the size but there is plenty of land and the culture shock would be far less than you might think.
My first choice would always be a partition of the U.S. into independent nations, something I have been advocating since right after the 2016 election. Perhaps even a joint effort where you combine the western U.S. and Alaska with most of Western Canada and leave eastern Canada to join up with the rest of the U.S.
We can cling to our guns and religion, the other states can see how awesome diversity really can be.
There are other options like New Zealand which has a common cultural heritage and is English speaking with a very low population density on par with Uruguay, but New Zealand seems to suffer from a similar case of white self-loathing which was on full display after the mass shooting in Christchurch when the prime minister Jacinda Ardern donned a hijab, a symbol of Islamic oppression of women, to virtue signal her solidarity with people who would make her a second-class citizen if they could. Of course she also was formerly the President of the International Union of Socialist Youth so she is a certifiable bimbo who has never held a real job. Fraser Anning gives me some hope but for now New Zealand seems to be on the same path that has led to ruin for Europe and North America. Perhaps Ukraine? Estonia is a highly developed nation with a low population density, advanced economy and crappy birthrates, along with neighboring Latvia and Lithuania. All three are almost entirely white, have almost no Muslims and are beautiful nations. Iceland is similar in terms of an almost all white population, advanced economy and near total absence of Islam. As an island in the middle of the North Atlantic, it is pretty hard for African or Mexican migrants to walk to Iceland. Plus Iceland has this going for it, Ms. Iceland 2018 Katrín Lea Elenudóttir
I think you can see the potential.
Then there is the dark horse candidate, Greenland.....
A model for how these white refugees could live can be found in the Amish community. They speak their own language, have their own culture and live distinct from the surrounding culture while at the same time being productive and low friction members of society. There are already large colonies of Mennonites in places like Paraguay and Uruguay that have thrived alongside the "regular" countrymen. So it can be done.
While you hopefully can understand why white Americans and Europeans might want to move to a place like Russia or Uruguay as an ark, the flip side is asking why they would want us. That is a fair question. The contemporary white inhabitants of Europe, Canada and the United States have mostly stood on the sidelines and watched as their own countries were being overrun as part of a plan to replace the heritage population with a new, easier to control non-white population. The people of the U.S. were entrusted with a nation that was the colossus that stood astride the free world, the economic, cultural and political envy of the rest of the globe. In response we squandered that position, treating our dearly earned inheritance like trash. We went from a nation that put a man on the moon to a nation that allows perverts access to our children and tolerates people who seriously suggest that women can have a penis. Not exactly a ringing endorsement.
Perhaps one the biggest selling points will be that we have already seen first hand what happens when you allow mass third world migration into your country. While many of our fellow countrymen will be content to stick around as the nation burns down or already have an escape plan thanks to dual-citizenship, those seeking refuge in a new country will be the people who understand what happens when you replace a high IQ, low time preference people with a low IQ, high time preference people.
While there probably isn't much call for professional video game players in these nations, there are tons of white people with useful skills. A lot of younger whites would like to farm but can't afford the enormous entry costs to buying land and equipment in the U.S.. Our trade schools churn out welders and electricians. Lots of whites have technical degrees that have been priced out of the market thanks to mass importation of Indians who are happy to work for peanuts and live 12 to an apartment. The people who are experts in banking, chemistry, engineering and medicine in America and Europe are largely white.
Not to put too fine a point on it but the European people are the people who explored the globe and mapped the world, mastered electricity and the atom, made it possible for man to fly and to set foot on the moon. There are few significant human achievements in the last 500 years that are not the result of the ingenuity and curious spirit of Europeans. People of European descent have some of the highest average IQs combined with a natural curiosity that leads to innovation. You can be forgiven for not knowing the truth thanks to the endless propaganda portraying Europeans as somehow simultaneously culture-less boors and at the same time evil geniuses conquering and exploiting the otherwise peaceful black and brown people of the world. Actually scratch that, the information is out there for the reading so you don't have an excuse.
Obviously this is just an academic exercise. I don't intend to abandon my homeland, the nation built by our forefathers that is being systematically overrun. Quite the contrary, I intend to fight for my nation and my people. My plans for now center around surviving and waiting out the storm and being in a position to help rebuild from the ashes. However it is a testament to just how grim the circumstances are that we are even thinking about this. While Europeans and Americans have done our fair share of destabilizing the globe, since the end of the second World War we have also been the stabilizing force. We keep the shipping lanes open that global commerce depends upon. We keep dictators in check, however imperfectly. No despot wants to be Saddam Hussein being dragged out of his spider hole or Qaddafi being violated and cruelly murdered by a mob. When something goes wrong, we show up. A devastating earthquake in Haiti, a famine in Africa, a civil war or a tsunami. When the non-European people have something awful happen, we show up to help. What happens when we can't do that anymore? There are already ample horror stories of UN "Peacekeepers" from third world nations raping, stealing, spreading cholera among the people they are "protecting". Imagine when a bankrupt and balkanized U.S. refuses to send troops to keep order in Africa because they are trying to keep our own cities from burning to the ground.
Without European people the world will descend into a darkness it will likely never recover from. The people that built the greatest civilizations and cultures the world has ever known are a precious and increasingly rare resource. I think one day some smart country is going to figure that out and become an ark for European people. That country will be poised to be the world's next superpower. Hopefully this time we will learn from our mistakes and vow to never let it happen again.